| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Definition of S_PSTATE only allowed PStateStruct[0], while it is
effectively used as a flexible array. Since sizeof(S_PSTATE) is
reduced here by sizeof(S_PSTATE_VALUES), we have to account for
that when calculating PStateLevelingSizeOfBytes.
In S_PSTATE context, PStateStruct[PStateMaxValue] is valid reference.
GCC 7.2.0 warns about an out of bounds array subscript.
```
CC libagesa/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.o
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.c: In function 'PStateLevelingMain':
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.c:524:65: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
PStateBufferPtrTmp->PStateCoreStruct[0].PStateStruct[k].PStateEnable = 0;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
Change-Id: If9598a951c6b882432689b677a956c44650c7083
Found-by: gcc (Debian 7.2.0-2) 7.2.0
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21297
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I6dbcd23b0ea03b1b965d43346ae1cf7cf1971eb7
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21260
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7576591b42fa62da2b3bd74f961fb297b85e250d
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/4806
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic63c456e775ad0863ea773abd957d9399e8e2a13
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6191
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I716253fe8532a4215e5770cd901ee3b3c4963d3d
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6187
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Success return value in DMI functions GetDmiInfoMain(..) and GetType4Type7Info(...) of AGESA vendorcode is "Flag = TRUE".
This results in a failure of init late function:
"agesawrapper_amdinitlate failed: 1"
It happens because TRUE = 1 = AGESA_UNSUPPORTED.
Replacing TRUE with AGESA_SUCCESS (= 0) fixes this problem.
Only family f15tn does not have such bug.
This patch just replaces TRUE with AGESA_SUCCESS, but maybe all DMI functions should be copied from Trinity family?
Tested on Supermicro H8QGI board with 4 AMD Opteron 6234 processors (f15).
Change-Id: I51bf91333c088a825b92d4a44d1ebe4380c8026c
Signed-off-by: Aladyshev Konstantin <aladyshev@nicevt.ru>
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2070
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This change updates the AMD Agesa code to support the Family 14
rev C0 cpus. It also fixes (again) a ton of warnings, although
not all of them are gone. The warning fixes affect code in the
Family 12 tree as well, so there are some small changes therein.
This code has been tested on a Persimmon and passes Abuild.
This is the first (and largest) of a number of commits to complete
the upgrade.
Change-Id: Id28d9bf7931f8baa2a602f6bb096a5a465ccd20d
Signed-off-by: Frank Vibrans <frank.vibrans@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: efdesign98 <efdesign98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/131
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
This change moves the AMD Family14 cpu Agesa code to
the vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14 folder to complete the
transition to the family oriented folder structure.
Change-Id: I211e80ee04574cc713f38b4cc1b767dbb2bfaa59
Signed-off-by: Frank Vibrans <frank.vibrans@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: efdesign98 <efdesign98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/52
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
|
