| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Accessing the higher vidtcon variables using pointer arithmetic from the
lower address FIMD_CTRL struct is undefined behaviour, since pointers
manipulations are not allowed outside the objects they point to. The
standard-blessed way is to perform the arithmetic using integer
addresses first, and then convert that to a pointer. The end result is
the same, but avoids the risk of unsafe optimizations from an
over-zealous compiler.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Found-by: Coverity CID 1402096, 1402124, 1402131, 1402169
Change-Id: I13ed23836e8e9076ae0bfd88c05c4f2badac9c49
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
MMIO operations are arch-agnostic so the include
path should not be arch/.
Change-Id: I0fd70f5aeca02e98e96b980c3aca0819f5c44b98
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31691
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I689c5663ef59861f79b68220abd146144f7618de
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27988
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I21680354f33916b7b4d913f51a842b5d6c2ecef3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27408
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Also unify __attribute__ ((..)) to __attribute__((..)) and
handle ((__packed__)) like ((packed))
Change-Id: Ie60a51c3fa92b5009724a5b7c2932e361bf3490c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This just updates existing guard name comments on the header files
to match the actual #define name.
As a side effect, if there was no newline at the end of these files,
one was added.
Change-Id: Ia2cd8057f2b1ceb0fa1b946e85e0c16a327a04d7
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12900
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The boot_device is a region_device that represents the
device from which coreboot retrieves and boots its stages.
The existing cbfs implementations use the boot_device as
the intermediary for accessing the CBFS region. Also,
there's currently only support for a read-only view of
the boot_device. i.e. one cannot write to the boot_device
using this view. However, a writable boot_device could
be added in the future.
Change-Id: Ic0da796ab161b8025c90631be3423ba6473ad31c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
We have known for a while that the old x86 model of calling init_timer()
in ramstage doesn't make sense on other archs (and is questionable in
general), and finally removed it with CL:219719. However, now timer
initialization is completely buried in the platform code, and it's hard
to ensure it is done in time to set up timestamps. For three out of four
non-x86 SoC vendors we have brought up for now, the timers need some
kind of SoC-specific initialization.
This patch reintroduces init_timer() as a weak function that can be
overridden by platform code. The call in ramstage is restricted to x86
(and should probably eventually be removed from there as well), and
other archs should call them at the earliest reasonable point in their
bootblock. (Only changing arm for now since arm64 and mips bootblocks
are still in very early state and should sync up to features in arm once
their requirements are better understood.) This allows us to move
timestamp_init() into arch code, so that we can rely on timestamps
being available at a well-defined point and initialize our base value as
early as possible. (Platforms who know that their timers start at zero
can still safely call timestamp_init(0) again from platform code.)
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, Blaze and Storm, compiled Daisy and Pit.
Change-Id: I1b064ba3831c0c5b7965b1d88a6f4a590789c891
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ffaebcd3785c4ce998ac1536e9fdd46ce3f52bfa
Original-Change-Id: Iece1614b7442d4fa9ca981010e1c8497bdea308d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/234062
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9606
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
We've had gpiolib.h which defines a few common GPIO access functions for
a while, but it wasn't really complete. This patch adds the missing
gpio_output() function, and also renames the unwieldy
gpio_get_in_value() and gpio_set_out_value() to the much easier to
handle gpio_get() and gpio_set(). The header is renamed to the simpler
gpio.h while we're at it (there was never really anything "lib" about
it, and it was presumably just chosen due to the IPQ806x include/
conflict problem that is now resolved).
It also moves the definition of gpio_t into SoC-specific code, so that
different implementations are free to encode their platform-specific
GPIO parameters in those 4 bytes in the most convenient way (such as the
rk3288 with a bitfield struct). Every SoC intending to use this common
API should supply a <soc/gpio.h> that typedefs gpio_t to a type at most
4 bytes in length. Files accessing the API only need to include <gpio.h>
which may pull in additional things (like a gpio_t creation macro) from
<soc/gpio.h> on its own.
For now the API is still only used on non-x86 SoCs. Whether it makes
sense to expand it to x86 as well should be separately evaluated at a
later point (by someone who understands those systems better). Also,
Exynos retains its old, incompatible GPIO API even though it would be a
prime candidate, because it's currently just not worth the effort.
BUG=None
TEST=Compiled on Daisy, Peach_Pit, Nyan_Blaze, Rush_Ryu, Storm and
Veyron_Pinky.
Change-Id: Ieee77373c2bd13d07ece26fa7f8b08be324842fe
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 9e04902ada56b929e3829f2c3b4aeb618682096e
Original-Change-Id: I6c1e7d1e154d9b02288aabedb397e21e1aadfa15
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/220975
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9400
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch aligns exynos5420 to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Peach_Pit.
Change-Id: If97b40101d3541a81bca302a9bd64b84a04ff24a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 570ca9ed6337d622781f37184b2cd7209de0083f
Original-Change-Id: I338559564e57bdc5202d34c7173ce0d075ad2afc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224501
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
