| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Move the FSP common code from the src/soc/intel/common directory into
the src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1 directory. Rename the Kconfig values
associated with this common code.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on kunimitsu
Change-Id: If1ca613b5010424c797e047c2258760ac3724a5a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e8228cb2a12df1cc06646071fafe10e50bf01440
Original-Change-Id: I4ea84ea4e3e96ae0cfdbbaeb1316caee83359293
Original-Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/306350
Original-Commit-Ready: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12156
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
|
|
In order to introduce a verstage which performs vboot
verification the cache-as-ram environment needs to be
generalized and split into pieces that can be utilized
in romstage and/or verstage. Therefore, the romstage
pieces were removed from the cache-as-ram specific pieces
that are generic:
- Add fsp/car.h to house the declarations for functions in
the cache-as-ram environment
- Only have cache_as_ram_params which are isolated form the
cache-as-ram environment aside from FSP_INFO_HEADER.
- Hardware requirements for console initialization is done
in the cache-as-ram specific files.
- Provide after_raminit.S which can be included from a
romstage separated from cache-as-ram as well as one that
is tightly coupled to the cache-as-ram environment.
- Update the fallout from the API changes in
soc/intel/{braswell,common,skylake}.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted glados.
Original-Change-Id: I2fb93dfebd7d9213365a8b0e811854fde80c973a
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/302481
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Id93089b7c699dd6d83fed8831a7e275410f05afe
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11816
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The report_platform_info() and set_max_freq() are not being
used similarly on skylake and braswell. With the addition
of other SoCs I suspect a similar pattern will emerge. Instead
of having weak functions to ensure things link with the hardcoded
policy push these calls into their respective SoC homes.
For parity, both skylake and braswell were updated to be consistent
with the same calls prior to this patch.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted glados. Built braswell.
Original-Change-Id: I3371d09aff0629503254296955fef28d35754a38
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/303334
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2de33632ed127cac52d7075cbad95cd6387a1b46
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11815
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Eliminate unused parameters from the console initialization.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
TEST=Build and run on kunimitsu
Original-Change-Id: Iacacea292d43615e9d2f8e5d3ec67e77f3f08906
Original-Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/301204
Original-Commit-Ready: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I3a0ea948ce106b07cb6aa872375ce588317dc437
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11814
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Instead of just passing bits, tsc_low, tsc_high, and an
opaque pointer to chipset context those fields are bundled
into a cache_as_ram_params struct. Additionally, a new
struct fsp_car_context is created to hold the FSP
information. These could be combined as the existing
romstage code assumes what the chipset_context values are, but
I'm leaving the concept of "common" alone for the time being.
While working in that area the ABI between assembly and C code
has changed to just pass a single pointer to cache_as_ram_params
struct. Lastly, validate the bootloader cache-as-ram region
with the Kconfig options.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44676
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted glados.
Original-Change-Id: Ib2a0e38477ef7c15cff1836836cfb55e5dc8a58e
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/300190
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic5a0daa4e2fe5eda0c4d2a45d86baf14ff7b2c6c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11809
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:
1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
near impossible to forward declare structs.
The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).
The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
selects. No other bindings are currently available,
but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
include path. This split can allow a version 2,
for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
(fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
the FSP relocation code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The SOC handler for memory init params is only taking UPD
as an input which does not allow it to use romstage_params.
In addition the UPD input is called params which is confusing
so rename it to upd so romstage_params can be passed properly.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:40635
BRANCH=none
TEST=build and boot on glados p2
Change-Id: I414610fee2b5d03a8e2cebfa548ea8bf49932a48
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Original-Commit-Id: db94d6f3e6cad721de2188a136df10ccf66aff6a
Original-Change-Id: I7ec15edd4a16df121c5967aadd8b2651267ec773
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/294066
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11413
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Since the FSP memory info HOB does not return all the data that we
need about a DIMM add a weak function that will allow the mainboard
to supplement the generated memory_info structure.
Ideally this would not be necessary but until FSP returns the
module part number we need this.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:42975, chrome-os-partner:42561
BRANCH=none
TEST=run "mosys memory spd print all" on glados
Change-Id: Ic6d0ee0a31d23efcf7e7d7f18a74e944e09e7b46
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 34ad7f1906ba526e52d38d5a6bce7b88b83f0c13
Original-Change-Id: I8509c5c627c1605894473fdea567e7f7ede08cf9
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/286876
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11033
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Restrict the use of the common romstage/ramstage code to FSP 1.1
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on cyan/sklrvp
Change-Id: Ifbdb6b4c201560a97617e83d69bf9974f9411994
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Remove the copyright address from the remaining files.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I026a0ff2bcb6c9580b45700edab446b787223007
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10336
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Provide a common romstage implementation for the Intel SOCs.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for Braswell
Change-Id: I80f5f8f0f36e9023117b07d4af5c806fff8157b6
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10050
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
