Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Sabrina has no SATA controller, so remove the corresponding PIRQ
mapping. This was verified with PPR #57243 Rev 1.53.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I98ffa3675c361e8a74c50ebfc37e79ae63dacc85
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61601
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The I2C pad control registers of Picasso and Cezanne are identical and
the one of Sabrina is a superset of it, so factor out the functionality.
To avoid having devicetree settings that contain raw register bits, the
i2c_pad_control struct is introduced and used. The old Picasso code for
this had the RX level hard-coded for 3.3V I2C interfaces, so keep it
this way in this patch but add a TODO for future improvements.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I1d70329644b68be3c4a1602f748e09db20cf6de1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61568
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I9d098a55a5c6f6e022c3896750c752e2759e101b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61567
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
No mainboard in the current tree implements mainboard_i2c_override. In a
follow-up commit the i2c_pad_control struct is introduced to be able to
make more parameters controllable by devicetree settings in the future.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8f9ed5d50d26e4623dc5888cc8af090fdd00fc03
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61566
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The SMU message response register was moved compared to Cezanne.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie384de52b1efb1d52f9018315a4b72916a4c9cee
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61095
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iac1b7308851c34bd1556c02af6b270e9346073e4
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61098
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The Sabrina SoC doesn't have the PM_ESPI_CS_USE_DATA2 bit defined in the
PM_SPI_PAD_PU_PD register. It also doesn't have a physical LPC interface
any more, so there are no LPC pins that can be reconfigured as eSPI
interface.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I02bc8d007901c71942475fe707637c5da7227230
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61097
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The CPPC feature isn't available on the Sabrina SoC, so drop the
corresponding code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I71a1b0717571729ebca3600ac433e621cafc4e61
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61096
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ic0226afd9e7fffd6bf196f06ee6c34b6b9c92f30
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61092
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Some of the names have slightly changed in the PPR, but I kept the
current names for consistency across all AMD SoCs in coreboot. Revision
1.50 of the PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6bda656015858a57e221b8d7819f944c21564a39
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61090
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The data fabric ID table in PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 has a different IOMS0
fabric ID than Cezanne.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I32890b5c03219f6ebf8180929d71ef726d382483
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61089
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Since we don't need to support PCI ID remapping for finding the correct
VBIOS binary for the integrated GPU, graphics.c can be dropped for now.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ifd5b678f472b3b5888353efd057203eb641be874
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61088
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Sabrina is family 17h model A0h.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I01e02e3491fb90941c767058986da876bdf7ca1d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61087
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UART controllers. Revision 1.50 of
the PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I628b1a7a0930f3409acdcabda2b864d42bf6bd23
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61086
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
|
|
The GPIO and GPIO MUX mapping as well as some GPIO to GEVENT mappings
have changed compared to Cezanne. Sabrina also doesn't have a remote
GPIO bank. Revision 1.50 of PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iabb85a3d24c881055e94400d08d01505df44a07a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61084
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs controllers. The PCI
interrupt index table in the new SoC's PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 doesn't
contain a PIRQ mapping for UART4. The reference code has a mapping for
this and it uses PIRQ mapping index 0x77 for UART4 and not for I2C5.
Since the I2C5 controller isn't owned by the x86 side and I didn't see
any mapping of the I2C5 controller into the x86 MMIO space, this seems
very plausible. Also add the corresponding fields to the ACPI code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I44780f5bc20966e6cc9867fca609d67f2893163d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61083
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs controllers.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Id98767197a21cb1a61f54fc9b256b10a9506c791
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61082
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs with DMA controllers.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I3a3d255bb4976a55623f3a161e791e80f1d01c69
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61081
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The Cezanne SoC code was initially started as a copy of example/min86
which only provides enough code to make the SoC code build. Then the
different parts of the real SoC support was brought in patch by patch
which also helped cleaning up and untangling the code. Since the Cezanne
SoC code is now in a rather good shape and the Sabrina SoC is similar to
the Cezanne SoC from the coreboot side, the new SoC support is started
with a copy of the Cezanne code and all the needed changes will be
applied on top of that. In order for the build not to fail due to
duplicate files, this patch does not only copy the directory, but also
replaces most instances of the Cezanne name with Sabrina. Since the
needed blobs aren't available in the 3rdparty/amd_blobs repository yet,
the Cezanne blobs are used for now so that the build will succeed. As
soon as the proper blobs will be available in that repository, the code
will be switched over to use them.
As suggested by Nico, I added a "TODO: Check if this is still correct"
comment to the beginning of every copied file and all SOC_AMD_COMMON_*
Kconfig option selects which will be removed after re-verifying that
each file and each selected common code block is still correct for the
new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I978ddbdbfd70863acac17d98732936ec2be8fe3c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|