Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Since the MCA(X) registers have defined values on the cold boot path,
the is_warm_reset check can be dropped. Also the warm reset bit in the
NCP_ERR register doesn't behave as the PPR [1] suggested; no matter if
something was written to the register or the machine went through a warm
reset cycle, the NCP_WARM_BOOT bit never got set.
[1] checked with PPR for AMD Family 17h Models 11h,18h B1 (RV,PCO)
#55570 Rev 3.15
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4e6df98ffd5d15ca204c9847a76c19c753726737
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55059
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
NCP_ERR is a 1 byte register in I/O-space, so use inb and not inw. The
variable the result gets assigned to is also a uint8_t.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I9fd8c139004111d6227c0316ba2a8b0281541654
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54736
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Even though the implementation is different on Stoneyridge compared to
Picasso and Cezanne, the function prototypes are identical, so move them
to the AMD SoC common reset header file.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8d3a3a9ea568ea18658c49612efabdbe36d5f957
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51395
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The FSP integration code needs this function to be present. It's not
supposed to be called, but if it is, it'll print an error and call the
SoC's cold reset function.
Change-Id: I15f2622d9d9d0f22e3cf8e6283b578f5933b1a9f
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48537
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The register name and the name of one bit are slightly different, but
have the same functionality.
Change-Id: I025f1c7b2c7643afe245f2275ae6ef45e64b951a
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48487
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
On Stoneyridge some PCI registers were accessed in this compilation
unit, but on Picasso this is no longer the case.
Change-Id: Ifbf65f9724a14d4847af98930759c865453775b4
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48486
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
"printk()" needs <console/console.h>.
Change-Id: Iac6b7000bcd8b1335fa3a0ba462a63aed2dc85b8
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45539
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
I would like to make assertions evaluate at compile time where possible,
but sometimes people used a literal assert(0) to force an assertion in a
certain code path. We already have BUG() for that so let's just replace
those instances with that.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I674e5f8ec7f5fe8b92b1c7c95d9f9202d422ce32
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44047
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
These are not northbridge functions.
BUG=b:147042464
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ia9e7d4c7554788a9fdbfdb90e6ead60060cc4c30
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41264
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
AMD has rewritten AGESA (now at v9) for direct inclusion into UEFI
build environments. Therefore, unlike the previous Arch2008
(a.k.a. v5), it can't be built without additional source, e.g. by
combining with EDK II, and it has no entry points for easily
building it into a legacy BIOS.
AGESA in coreboot now relies on the FSP 2.0 framework published
by Intel and uses the existing fsp2_0 driver.
* Add fsp_memory_init() to romstage.c. Although Picasso comes out
of reset with DRAM alive, this call is added to maximize
compatibility and facilitate internal development. Future work
may look at removing it. AGESA reports the memory map to coreboot
via HOBs returned from fsp_memory_init().
* AGESA currently sets up MTRRs, as in most older generations.
Take ownership back immediately before running ramstage.
* Remove cbmem initialization, as the FSP driver handles this.
* Add chipset_handle_reset() for compatibility.
* Top of memory is determined by the FSP driver checking the HOBs
passed from AGESA. Note that relying on the TOM register happens
to be misleading when UMA is below 4GB.
BUG=b:147042464
TEST=Boot trembyle to payload
Change-Id: Iecb3a3f2599a8ccbc168b1d26a0271f51b71dcf0
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34423
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I22fffa0eab006be2bad4d3dd776b22ad9830faef
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40129
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Remove the scratch register indicators. Per AMD, AGESA no longer
uses these. Use a new IO register to determine whether a warm
reset should occur.
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I0ff7935004b3d1ac5204d3ef575cfa98116a57fa
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33989
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
So that everyone can see what's being updated from stoney, we're
starting with a direct copy of the stoney directory. There are
arguments both for and against doing it this way, but I believe
This the most transparent way. We've moved much of the duplicated
stoney code into the soc/amd/common directory and will continue
that work as it becomes obvious that we have unchanged code between
the SOCs.
Makefile.inc has been renamed as makefile.inc so that it won't
build in jenkins until the directory is updated.
Other than that change, this is an exact copy of the stoneyridge
SOC directory which will be updated in the follow-on commits in
the patch train.
TEST=None
BUG=b:130804851
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6809bd1eea304f76dd9000c079b3ed09f94dbd3b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32407
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|