Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file()
to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the
start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common
operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less
commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or
cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to
keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast
majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual
operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from
the common ones).
cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly
reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to
generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce
this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot
medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for
non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS
cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide
some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be
outright forbidden when it makes sense.
Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures.
The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the
whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type
field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers
to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing
this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority
of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Found using:
diff <(git grep -l '#include <stdint.h>' -- src/) <(git grep -l 'int8_t\|int16_t\|int32_t\|int64_t\|intptr_t\|intmax_t\|s8\|u8\|s16\|u16\|s32\|u32\|s64\|u64\|INT8_MIN\|INT8_MAX\|INT16_MIN\|INT16_MAX\|INT32_MIN\|INT32_MAX\|INT64_MIN\|INT64_MAX\|INTMAX_MIN\|INTMAX_MAX' -- src/) |grep -v vendorcode |grep '<'
Change-Id: I5e14bf4887c7d2644a64f4d58c6d8763eb74d2ed
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41827
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It only contains a pointer to another struct. Flatten it.
Change-Id: Iab427592c332646e032a768719fc380c5794086b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43106
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
Instead of using function pointers, we can use weak functions. So, drop
the pointer from `romstage_params`, leaving `pei_data` as the only
remaining member. This will be cleaned up in a follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I3b17d21ea7a650734119a5cab4892fcb158b589d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43105
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This will allow dropping the pointer inside romstage_params.
Change-Id: Iec6dac1a271b22d6c09b4064a9e8a310e57026a6
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43102
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
There's no need to repeat the same values over four variants.
Change-Id: Ifc4a9961fe9c87f15a6039e6e478682fab5b0bb7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43039
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The WDB (Write Data Buffer) is a data region in CAR, used as a
scratchpad in the read and write training algorithms of memory
initialization. Both SNB and IVB use this buffer, but HSW does not.
Unlike earlier chipsets, Haswell contains much more in-hardware memory
training machinery, known as REUT (Robust Electrical Unified Testing).
Among other changes, the REUT hardware has a pattern storage buffer,
which renders the need for a pattern storage buffer in CAR obsolete.
Deprecate the WDB-related parameters in the pei_data structure for
Haswell, as they are leftovers from the previous generation's MRC.
Remove them from the mainboards, and explain why they are not required.
Because the MRC ABI has to remain the same, the layout of pei_data must
not be changed, so rename the WDB parameters instead of deleting them.
Tested on Asrock B85M Pro4, still boots with the MRC from Google Wolf.
Change-Id: I7acc9353a22f8c6f9fe6407617162f35849a79dd
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40406
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I74fd273aff05e6635d4964f3614c2f1dd5562b4b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40194
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If99c8ea1aa437f261e8ab3c8a164d01be8bc58e9
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33893
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
When entry to romstage is via cpu/intel/car/romstage.c
BIST has not been passed down the path for sometime.
Change-Id: I345975c53014902269cee21fc393331d33a84dce
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34908
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Change-Id: I23bc0191ca8fcd88364e5c08be7c90195019e399
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32012
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
The other DEFAULT_ entries are just immediate
constants.
Change-Id: Iebf4266810b8210cebabc814bba2776638d9b74d
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31758
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Since dual-channel setups use same RAM/SPD for both channels,
populate spd_data[1] with same SPD data as spd_data[0],
allowing info for both channels to propogate into the
SBMIOS tables.
Clean up calculations using SPD length to avoid repetition.
Changes modeled after google/auron variants.
Change-Id: I7e14b35642a3fbaecaeb7d1d33b5a7c1405bac45
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19981
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Combine existing boards google/falco and google/peppy with new
ChromeOS devices leon and wolf, using their common reference board
(slippy) as a base.
Chromium sources used:
firmware-falco_peppy-4389.81.B d7703cac [falco: Add support for Samsung...]
firmware-leon-4389.61.B ea1bf55 [haswell: Enable 2x Refresh Mode]
firmware-wolf-4389.24.B 7c5a9c2 [Wolf: haswell: Add small delay before...]
Additionally, some minor cleanup/changes were made:
- I2C devices set to use ACPI (vs PCI) mode
- I2C device ACPI entries adjusted as per above
- I2C devices set to use level (vs edge) interrupt triggering
- XHCI finalization enabled in devicetree
- HDA verb entries use simplified macro entry format
Existing google/falco and google/peppy boards will be removed in a
subsequent commit.
Variant setup modeled after google/beltino
Change-Id: I087df5f98c1bb4ddd0ab24ee9ff786a9d38d87be
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17621
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|