summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/drivers/spi/sst.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-12-19drivers/spi: fix flash writes at page boundariesAaron Durbin
There was an assumption that all SPI controllers could consume a full page of data to write. However, that assumption doesn't hold when spi_crop_chunk() indicates sizes smaller than page size. If the requested offset isn't page aligned from the start then writes will fail corrupting data since a page boundary isn't honored. The spansion driver needed quite a bit more work to honor the spi_crop_chunk() result. It now mimics the other driver's code. Also, needed to add spi_crop_chunk() to marvell/bg4cd SoC to make google/cosmos build. SPI obviously doesn't work on that platform, but it fixes the build error. Change-Id: I93e24a5a717adcee45a017c164bd960f4592ad50 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17910 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2016-12-06spi_flash: Make a deep copy of spi_slave structureFurquan Shaikh
Commit 36b81af (spi: Pass pointer to spi_slave structure in spi_setup_slave) changes the way spi_setup_slave handles the spi_slave structure. Instead of expecting spi controller drivers to maintain spi_slave structure in CAR_GLOBAL/data section, caller is expected to manage the spi_slave structure. This requires that spi_flash drivers maintain spi_slave structure and flash probe function needs to make a copy of the passed in spi_slave structure. This change fixes the regression on Lenovo X230 and other mainboards. Change-Id: I0ad971eecaf3bfe301e9f95badc043193cc27cab Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17728 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Iru Cai <mytbk920423@gmail.com>
2016-11-22spi: Clean up SPI flash driver interfaceFurquan Shaikh
RW flag was added to spi_slave structure to get around a requirement on some AMD flash controllers that need to group together all spi volatile operations (write/erase). This rw flag is not a property or attribute of the SPI slave or controller. Thus, instead of saving it in spi_slave structure, clean up the SPI flash driver interface. This allows chipsets/mainboards (that require volatile operations to be grouped) to indicate beginning and end of such grouped operations. New user APIs are added to allow users to perform probe, read, write, erase, volatile group begin and end operations. Callbacks defined in spi_flash structure are expected to be used only by the SPI flash driver. Any chipset that requires grouping of volatile operations can select the newly added Kconfig option SPI_FLASH_HAS_VOLATILE_GROUP and define callbacks for chipset_volatile_group_{begin,end}. spi_claim_bus/spi_release_bus calls have been removed from the SPI flash chip drivers which end up calling do_spi_flash_cmd since it already has required calls for claiming and releasing SPI bus before performing a read/write operation. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully. Change-Id: Idfc052e82ec15b6c9fa874cee7a61bd06e923fbf Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2016-03-11spi/SST: fix write support for SST25VF064CAlexander Couzens
The SST25VF064C doesn't support the auto incrementing write which all other supported SST chips support. Allow the chips to select their write method. Change-Id: Ic088d35461a625469ee6973d1267d7dd11963496 Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14000 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-04-17spi: Add function to read flash status registerDuncan Laurie
Add a function that allows reading of the status register from the SPI chip. This can be used to determine whether write protection is enabled on the chip. BUG=chrome-os-partner:35209 BRANCH=haswell TEST=build and boot on peppy Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/240702 Reviewed-by: Shawn N <shawnn@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c58f17689162b291a7cdb57649a237de21b73545) Change-Id: Ib7fead2cc4ea4339ece322dd18403362c9c79c7d Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 9fbdf0d72892eef4a742a418a347ecf650c01ea5 Original-Change-Id: I2541b22c51e43f7b7542ee0f48618cf411976a98 Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/241128 Original-Reviewed-by: Shawn N <shawnn@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9730 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-04-17drivers/spi: Pass flash parameters from coreboot to payloadDan Ehrenberg
A payload may want to run erase operations on SPI NOR flash without re-probing the device to get its properties. This patch passes up three properties of flash to achieve that: - The size of the flash device - The sector size, i.e., the granularity of erase - The command used for erase The patch sends the parameters through coreboot and then libpayload. The patch also includes a minor refactoring of the flash erase code. Parameters are sent up for just one flash device. If multiple SPI flash devices are probed, the second one will "win" and its parameters will be sent up to the payload. TEST=Observed parameters to be passed up to depthcharge through libpayload and be used to correctly initialize flash and do an erase. TEST=Winbond and Gigadevices spi flash drivers compile with the changes; others don't, for seemingly unrelated reasons. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:446377 Change-Id: Ib8be86494b5a3d1cfe1d23d3492e3b5cba5f99c6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 988c8c68bbfcdfa69d497ea5f806567bc80f8126 Original-Change-Id: Ie2b3a7f5b6e016d212f4f9bac3fabd80daf2ce72 Original-Signed-off-by: Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/239570 Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9726 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-17spi_flash: Move (de-)assertion of /CS to single locationDavid Hendricks
This consolidates all calls to spi_claim_bus() and spi_release_bus() to a single location where spi_xfer() is called. This avoids confusing (and potentially redundant) calls that were being done throughout the generic spi_flash.c functions and chip-specific functions. I don't think the current approach could even work since many chip drivers assert /CS once and then issue multiple commands such as page program followed by reading the status register. I suspect the reason we didn't notice it on x86 is because the ICH/PCH handled each individual command correctly (spi_claim_bus() and spi_release_bus() are noops) in spite of the broken code. BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=tested on nyan and link Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Change-Id: I3257e2f6a2820834f4c9018069f90fcf2bab05f6 Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/194510 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit d3394d34fb49e9e252f67371674d5b3aa220bc9e) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Ieb62309b18090d8f974f91a6e448af3d65dd3d1d Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7829 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-07-17drivers/spi: Sanitize headers from preprocessor abuseEdward O'Callaghan
Continuing on from the rational given in: a173a62 Remove guarding #includes by CONFIG_FOO combinations Change-Id: I35c636ee7c0b106323b3e4b90629f7262750f8bd Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6114 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2014-05-18drivers/spi/sst.c: Remove unused func to_sst_spi_flash()Edward O'Callaghan
Trips up clang builds with a warn treated as error. Change-Id: I9c0e2930ba8a60c7ad6063e9826b1b8638185505 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5779 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2012-12-12Claim the SPI bus before writes if the IMC ROM is presentMartin Roth
The SB800 and Hudson now support adding the IMC ROM which runs from the same chip as coreboot. When the IMC is running, write or erase commands sent to the spi bus will fail, and the IMC will die. To fix this, we send a request to the IMC to stop fetching from the SPI rom while we write to it. This process (in one form or another) is required for writes to the SPI bus while the IMC is running. Because the IMC can take up to 500ms to respond every time we claim the bus, this patch tries to keep the number of times we need to do that to a minimum. We only need to claim the bus on writes, and using a counter for the semaphore allows us to call in once to claim the bus at the beginning of a number of transactions and it will stay claimed until we release it at the end of the transactions. Claim() - takes up to 500ms hit claim() - no delay erase() release() claim() - no delay write() release() Release() Change-Id: I4e003c5122a2ed47abce57ab8b92dee6aa4713ed Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1976 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-12-08Limit SPI device debug prints with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPI_FLASHMarc Jones
Fix debug printks which were not using CONFIG_DEBUG_SPI_FLASH, which would cause long delays durring boot when SPI devices were written. Change-Id: I99fc3d5f847fdf4bb98e2a0342ea418ab7d5fc54 Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1965 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-11-27SPI/SST: Add OpCode Enable-Write-Status-Register (EWSR)Zheng Bao
For SST chips, the Write-Status-Register instruction must be executed immediately after the execution of the Enable-Write-Status-Register instruction, instead of Write-Enable. Change-Id: I4b3473cd671829def3bd1641ececcf8d9dad4a56 Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com> Signed-off-by: zbao <fishbaozi@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1919 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-05-26Fix printk types in SPI flash driversStefan Reinauer
- use %zu instead of %zd for size_t (%zd is for ssize_t) - use %x instead of %lx for u32 - break some long lines to avoid commit hook trouble Change-Id: Idfad716523dbcd2a595d26317240e972b5253e8b Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1041 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-05-14SPI driver: style fixPatrick Georgi
lint tests for labels to start at BOL, no spaces before them. Change-Id: Icf6ce533f26998a81b4be46d17e2d0b6b868904d Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1029 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2012-05-10Add SPI flash driverStefan Reinauer
This driver is taken from u-boot and adapted to match coreboot. It still contains some hacks and is ICH specific at places. Change-Id: I97dd8096f7db3b62f8f4f4e4d08bdee10d88f689 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/997 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>