summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5420/clk.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-08-14exynos5: Refactor crazy old U-Boot base address macros awayJulius Werner
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name() boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make another device fit into that ugly scheme). This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably didn't catch all differences). Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-12-21exynos5420: re-factor clock_get_periph_rate()David Hendricks
This re-factors clock_get_periph_rate() to be a simpler and also make a few corrections along the way. To summarize: - clk_bit_info is no longer used. It had numerous errors and was really painful anyway since it was just a bunch of opaque magic numbers that made bugs non-obvious. - Clock source bitfields for peripherals handled in the switch statement are 3 bits, not 4. Some divider values are 3 bits, some are 4. The earlier code always assumed 4 bits for both which included reserved bits in many cases. - UART source clock and divider shift values were wrong. - PWM clock divider was being read from the wrong register. - SPI3 divider value was being read from the wrong register. - There was a really confusing calculation for SDMMC0 and SDMMC2 clock rates, but it was never actually used since the switch statement never handled PERIPH_ID_SDMMC{0,2} and would thus return if they were ever passed into this function. Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Change-Id: I0a03a64d8b42fbe83dbf377292597ce681b22f4b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65284 Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4463 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-21exynos5420: add a peripheral clock select --> PLL decoderDavid Hendricks
This adds a helper function to translate between peripheral clock select fields in clock source registers and PLLs. Some of this was already done to handle a few special cases, this generalizes the earlier work so that follow-up patches can do further clean-up. Unfortunately, the PLLs represented by clock select fields in various modules are not uniformly ordered. So for now we focus on peripheral clock sources only. Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Change-Id: Id58a3e488650d09e6a35c22d5394fcbf0ee9ddff Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65283 Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-21exynos5420: add CPLL and DPLL to the known list of PLLsDavid Hendricks
This patch adds CPLL and DPLL to the known list of PLLs. This is ported from https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/62617/ Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Change-Id: I2f2614e44cd9c98d98b8db9347f29de21703d1af Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65282 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4461 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-12-12exynos5420: Setup clocks for MMC bus controller.Hung-Te Lin
To configure source clocks on Exynos 5420 for MMC drivers. Some registers are different from the 5250. FSYS now has two parts and MMC uses FSYS2. The MMC block uses MPLL as the clock source. The "high-speed" MMC interface runs as 52MHz, so divider is set accordingly. Also, the MMC driver has changed from MSHCI (Mobile Storage Host Controller Interface) to DWMCI (DesignWare MMC Controller Interface). Change-Id: I9ba9cf43e2f2dcd9da747888c0c7676bd545177b Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/60858 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4354 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-07-10exynox5420: Remove the 5250 clock registers and fix the SPI frequency.Gabe Black
The 5420 clock code still had a data structure in it for the 5250 clock registers which was used by some of the clock functions. That caused some clocks to be configured incorrectly, specifically the i2c clock which was running at about 80KHz instead of about 600KHz as configured by U-Boot. Also, the registers and bit positions used to set up the SPI bus were not consistent with U-Boot, and if the bus clock rate were set to 50MHz, a rate which has historically worked on snow, loading would fail. With these fixes the clock rate can be set to 50MHz and the device boots as much as is expected. I haven't yet measured the actual frequency of the bus to verify that it's now being calculated correctly. Change-Id: Id53448fcb6d186bddb3f889c84ba267135dfbc00 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3678 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10exynos5420: Fix some problems with the clock management code.Gabe Black
The code which figured out the rate of the input clock to a peripheral was doing several things wrong. First, it was using the wrong values when determing what the source of a clock was set to. Second, it was using the wrong offset into that register to find the current source setting. This change fixes the constants which select a clock source which get some more things working, but doesn't attempt to fix the bit position table. Change-Id: Id7482ee1c78cec274353bae3ce2dccb84705c66a Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3665 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10exynos5420: Replace the 5250 clock logic with 5420.Gabe Black
The new code is stolen from U-Boot with little or no understanding of how it works. Change-Id: I3de7d25174072f6068d9d4fdaa308c0462296737 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3658 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10pit: Create an exynos5420 directory which is nearly a copy of exynos5250.Gabe Black
This change creates an exynos5420 directory with code that will eventually implement support for the exynos5420 cpu from Samsung. Currently it's a copy of the exynos5250 directory with the name changed. There are going to be some problems where headers in src/cpu/samsung/exynos-common include headers in the exynos5250 directory directly. Change-Id: Ia8d7244310d32499238bbc171c0c668ec48178e1 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3644 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>