| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name()
boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner
ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly
every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the
sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make
another device fit into that ugly scheme).
This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from
the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete
confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and
exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and
EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably
didn't catch all differences).
Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code
was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded
code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports.
There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the
5250's Kconfig file.
Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Per a conversation with Stefan, these chip-dependent files are moved
to the src tree, in the manner of other chips (north and southbridge).
Change-Id: I12645ba05eb241eda200ed06cb633541a6a98119
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1925
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
