| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The UART / serial console is put in retention state by kernel during suspend /
resume path, which caused Coreboot not able to print any messages during resume.
Sending values to the padret_uart_opt inside PMU may release UART, but that may
also cause unexpected output when kernel is back. However, it's still very
helpful when we are debugging suspend/resume inside Coreboot.
To get UART message on resume, call wakeup_enable_uart() in boot block or
romstage (before console_init).
Change-Id: Ib5759cb402c6e018d9dba14fad8b61f6a1b1a265
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170440
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 547fbbfe2eeb6da4e161f36be2caf8099f9eac9b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6649
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name()
boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner
ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly
every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the
sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make
another device fit into that ugly scheme).
This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from
the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete
confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and
exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and
EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably
didn't catch all differences).
Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This patch moves around some of the existing Exynos5 USB 2.0 PHY code
to make it cleaner in preparation of the 3.0 PHYs. It moves the VBUS
GPIOs (which are completely board-specific) into the mainboard code and
makes sure to only initialize PHYs on the boards that actually need
them. It also removes the USB 3.0 PLL hack that was needed on Snow from
the Pit and Kirby boards (which do not have that PLL anymore).
Change-Id: Ia35f47a765acff60481f0907f7448ec4f78e0937
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66887
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit c3b1a8b687b535f4d5ac1b3bd2a4760151698fdb)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6609
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code
was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded
code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports.
There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the
5250's Kconfig file.
Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
It turns out that the exynos5-common code previously imported from
u-boot is not common code at all but very specific to the 5250 and
not compatible with the 5450. Hence, unify the directories exynos5250
and exynos5-common. We will try to factor out common code while
progressing with the 5450 port.
Change-Id: Iab595e66fcd01eda8365c96fb8bef896f7602f03
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3641
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This moves the prototype for power_enable_hw_thermal_trip() to
a generic location so it can be used by generalized thermal
management code. The implementation will still be CPU-specific.
Change-Id: Iae449cb8c72c8441dedaf65b73db9898b4730cef
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3105
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This moves highly board-specific code out from the Exynos5250
power_init() into Snow's romstage.c. There's no reason the CPU-
specific code should care about which PMIC we are using and
which bus it is on.
Change-Id: I52313177395519cddcab11225fc23d5e50c4c4e3
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3034
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
OK, this is tl;dr. But I need to write this in hopes we make
sure we don't put code like this into coreboot. Ever.
Our excuse in this case is that it was imported, not obviously wrong,
and easily changed. It made sense to get it in, make it work, then
do a cleanup pass, because changing everything up front is almost
impossible to debug.
The exynos code has bunch of base register values, e.g.
These are base addresses of things that look like a memory-mapped
struct. To get these to a pointer, they created the following macro,
which creates an inline function.
static inline unsigned int samsung_get_base_##device(void) \
{ \
return cpu_is_exynos5() ? EXYNOS5_##base : 0; \
}
And then invoke it 31 times in a .h file, e.g.:
SAMSUNG_BASE(clock, CLOCK_BASE)
to create 31 functions.
And then use it:
struct exynos5_clock *clk =
(struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
OK, what's wrong with this? It's easier to ask what's right with it. Answer: nothing.
I have a long list of what's wrong, and I may leave some things out,
but here goes:
1. the "function" can return a NULL if we're not on exynos5. Most uses of the code
don't check the return value.
2. And why would this function be running, if we're not on an exynos5? Why compile it in?
3. Note the cast everywhere a samsung_get_base_xxx is used.
The function returns an untyped variable, requiring the *user* to get two
things right: the cast, and the function invocation. One can replace that _clock(); with
_power(); in the code above, and they will be referencing the wrong registers, and
they'll never get an error!
We have a C compiler; use it to type data.
4. You're generating 31 functions using cpp each and every time the file is included.
The C compiler has to parse these each time. It's not at all like a simple cpp
macro which is only generated on use.
5. You can't tags or etags this code
6. In fact, any kind of analysis tool will be unable to do anything with this cpp magic.
That's only a partial list.
So what's the right way to do it? Just make typed constants, viz:
Or, since I expect people will want the lower case function syntax, I've left
it that way:
Now we've got something that is efficient, and we don't even need to protect with
any more.
Hence this change. We've got something that is type checked, does not require users to
cast on each use, will catch simple programming errors, can be analyzed with standard tools,
and builds faster.
So if we make a mistake:
struct exynos5_clock *clk =
samsung_get_base_adc();
We'll see it:
src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c: In function 'get_pll_clk':
src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c:183:3: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
which we would not have seen before.
As a minor benefit, it shaves most of a second off the compilation.
Change-Id: Ie67bc4bc038a8dd1837b977d07332d7d7fd6be1f
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2582
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
s5p-common mostly contained duplicate files, drop the whole directory
and merge the few pieces that we are using into exynos5-common.
Change-Id: I5f18e8a6d2379d719ab6bbbf817fe15bda70d17f
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2405
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
Remove duplicated / testing code and share more driver for bootblock, romstage
and ramstage.
The __PRE_RAM__ is now also defined in bootblock build stage, since bootblock is
executed before RAM is initialized.
Change-Id: I4f5469b1545631eee1cf9f2f5df93cbe3a58268b
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2282
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
"SPL" from U-Boot is deprecated by bootblock in coreboot/arm, so we don't need
it anymore.
Change-Id: Id16877075d0b870839a10160073ad70777a2af0a
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2297
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Turns out initializing power rails is necessary, even for getting
serial output.
Change-Id: I3042c1001ae43b1e793ee6cb90bb79b8db0f8fd1
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2126
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
... to fit into the naming convention
Change-Id: I4a7d81c4d6674d001fc831df863bd2343f6c636f
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2020
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
When we need i2c for this cpu we will use the coreboot
smbus code.
Change-Id: I4ba4cc9ae10e5ca830d621ee9c8d9f7bd2129e2f
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2019
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The max include file is in src/drivers/power.
Change-Id: I2e663b472cade17fc50edbb449c0e54fd4a991eb
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2017
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
Samsung SoC files, including Exynos5 (a Cortex-A15
implementation). Since this is an SoC we'll forego the x86-style
{north,south}bridge and cpu distinction. We may try to split some
stuff out before the final version if prudent.
Change-Id: Ie068e9dc3dd836c83d90e282b10d5202e7a4ba9b
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2005
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
