the attached patch is the last infrastructure change necessary for

romfs.
Everything else to make a target romfs aware happens in the targets.

What the patch does:
1. missing romfs.h include
2. special handling while creating coreboot.rom
While the romfs code path in the makefile doesn't actually use the file,
it's possible that the build of coreboot.rom fails in a romfs setup,
because the individual buildrom image is too small to host both coreboot
and payloads (as the payloads aren't supposed to be there). Thus, a
special case to replace the payload with /dev/null in case of a romfs
build.
There would be cleaner ways, but they're not easily encoded in the
Config.lb format.
3. config.g is changed to create rules for a romfs build

Targets should still build (they do for me)

Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>



git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4049 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/util/newconfig/config.g b/util/newconfig/config.g
index eddff03092..c2f7e20aed 100644
--- a/util/newconfig/config.g
+++ b/util/newconfig/config.g
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ global_uses_options = {}
 global_exported_options = []
 romimages = {}
 buildroms = []
+rommapping = {}
 curimage = 0
+bootblocksize = 0
 alloptions = 0 # override uses at top level
 
 local_path = re.compile(r'^\.')
@@ -277,8 +279,11 @@ class romimage:
 		self.arch = arch
 
 	def setpayload(self, payload):
+		global rommapping
 		self.payload = payload
 
+		rommapping[self.name] = payload
+
 	def setinitfile(self, initfile):
 		self.initfile = initfile
 
@@ -1351,7 +1356,10 @@ def startromimage(name):
 
 def endromimage():
 	global curimage
+	global bootblocksize
 	mainboard()
+	imagesize = getoption("ROM_IMAGE_SIZE", curimage)
+	bootblocksize += imagesize
 	print "End ROMIMAGE"
 	curimage = 0
 	#curpart = 0
@@ -2209,16 +2217,22 @@ def writeimagemakefile(image):
 
 #
 def writemakefile(path):
+	global rommapping
+	global bootblocksize
 	makefilepath = os.path.join(path, "Makefile")
 	print "Creating", makefilepath
 	file = safe_open(makefilepath, 'w+')
 	writemakefileheader(file, makefilepath)
 
 	# main rule
-	file.write("\nall:")
+	file.write("\nall: romtool")
 	for i in buildroms:
-		file.write(" %s" % i.name)
+		file.write(" %sfs" % i.name)
 	file.write("\n\n")	
+
+	# romtool rules
+	file.write("\nromtool:\n\tcd $(TOP)/util/romtool; make\n")
+
 	file.write("include Makefile.settings\n\n")
 	for i, o in romimages.items():
 		file.write("%s/coreboot.rom:\n" % o.getname())
@@ -2245,9 +2259,26 @@ def writemakefile(path):
 		for j in i.roms:
 			file.write(" %s/coreboot.rom " % j)
 		file.write("> %s\n\n" %i.name)
+		# build the bootblock here as well. 
+		file.write("\n")
+		file.write("\t cat ")
+		for j in i.roms:
+			file.write(" %s/coreboot.strip " % j)
+		file.write("> %s.bootblock\n\n" %i.name)
+
+	romsize = getoption("ROM_SIZE", image)
+	# i.name? That can not be right, can it? 
+	file.write("%sfs: %s $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool\n" %(i.name,i.name));
+	file.write("\trm -f coreboot.romfs\n");
+	file.write("\t$(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs create %s %s %s.bootblock\n" % (i.name, romsize, bootblocksize, i.name))
+	for i in buildroms:
+		for j in i.roms:
+			#failover is a hack that will go away soon. 
+			if (j != "failover") and (rommapping[j] != "/dev/null"):
+				file.write("\t $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs add-payload %s %s/payload\n" % (i.name, rommapping[j], j))
+		file.write("\t $(TOP)/util/romtool/romtool %sfs print\n" % i.name)
 
-
-	file.write(".PHONY: all clean")
+	file.write(".PHONY: all clean romtool")
 	for i in romimages.keys():
 		file.write(" %s-clean" % i)
 	for i, o in romimages.items():