diff options
| author | Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> | 2023-08-20 12:02:10 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de> | 2023-08-21 18:41:37 +0000 |
| commit | cab460f0a44e76f0eb92060704bdb107ed7adb7d (patch) | |
| tree | 17173af28681626abf4e77d4c3712cc7632bda99 /util/crossgcc | |
| parent | 647252ba84c5ada60b98ef9b869fda38ad528e54 (diff) | |
util/crossgcc: rename binutils patch from 'loosing' to 'losing'
This binutils patch was pushed by the original author using the word
"loosing", which means "to release" instead of "losing", meaning to drop
or misplace.
I did not change the spelling of the commit message inside the patch so
that the patch can still be tracked easily, but wanted to fix the
mistaken spelling which appears when the patch is applied when building
the crossgcc toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I66fd596a79c9eb331f473d175180cf7bb5a38529
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77327
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'util/crossgcc')
| -rw-r--r-- | util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_losing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch (renamed from util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_loosing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch) | 0 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_loosing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch b/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_losing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch index 548540c8c4..548540c8c4 100644 --- a/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_loosing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch +++ b/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.40_stop_losing_entry_point_when_LTO_enabled.patch |