summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/arch/arm64/armv8
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>2018-06-25 18:06:59 -0700
committerJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>2018-06-26 23:59:18 +0000
commite0058e89ab94ef7ef366c596d3e03ad693694d2a (patch)
tree9d30123effa4f26419fcf2a12ab909e5d0ebf881 /src/arch/arm64/armv8
parenta98b5bf89b39fede95c34bf81e9decc1e6b6d38f (diff)
arm64: Reimplement mmu_disable() in assembly
Disabling the MMU with proper cache behavior is a bit tricky on ARM64: you can flush the cache first and then disable the MMU (like we have been doing), but then you run the risk of having new cache lines allocated in the tiny window between the two, which may or may not become a problem when those get flushed at a later point (on some platforms certain memory regions "go away" at certain points in a way that makes the CPU very unhappy if it ever issues a write cycle to them again afterwards). The obvious alternative is to first disable the MMU and then flush the cache, ensuring that every memory access after the flush already has the non-cacheable attribute. But we can't just flip the order around in the C code that we have because then those accesses in the tiny window in-between will go straight to memory, so loads may yield the wrong result or stores may get overwritten again by the later cache flush. In the end, this all shouldn't really be a problem because we can do both operations purely from registers without doing any explicit memory accesses in-between. We just have to reimplement the function in assembly to make sure the compiler doesn't insert any stack accesses at the wrong points. Change-Id: Ic552960c91400dadae6f130b2521a696eeb4c0b1 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27238 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/arch/arm64/armv8')
-rw-r--r--src/arch/arm64/armv8/cpu.S15
-rw-r--r--src/arch/arm64/armv8/mmu.c14
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/arch/arm64/armv8/cpu.S b/src/arch/arm64/armv8/cpu.S
index 1bb8c838ad..935f1fe7bd 100644
--- a/src/arch/arm64/armv8/cpu.S
+++ b/src/arch/arm64/armv8/cpu.S
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
*/
#include <arch/asm.h>
+#include <arch/cache.h>
.macro dcache_apply_all crm
dsb sy
@@ -83,6 +84,20 @@ ENTRY(dcache_clean_invalidate_all)
dcache_apply_all crm=cisw
ENDPROC(dcache_clean_invalidate_all)
+/* This must be implemented in assembly to ensure there are no accesses to
+ memory (e.g. the stack) in between disabling and flushing the cache. */
+ENTRY(mmu_disable)
+ str x30, [sp, #-0x8]
+ mrs x0, sctlr_el3
+ mov x1, #~(SCTLR_C | SCTLR_M)
+ and x0, x0, x1
+ msr sctlr_el3, x0
+ isb
+ bl dcache_clean_invalidate_all
+ ldr x30, [sp, #-0x8]
+ ret
+ENDPROC(mmu_disable)
+
/*
* Bring an ARMv8 processor we just gained control of (e.g. from IROM) into a
* known state regarding caches/SCTLR/PSTATE. Completely invalidates
diff --git a/src/arch/arm64/armv8/mmu.c b/src/arch/arm64/armv8/mmu.c
index 48f77ace83..606a9b30ad 100644
--- a/src/arch/arm64/armv8/mmu.c
+++ b/src/arch/arm64/armv8/mmu.c
@@ -321,17 +321,3 @@ void mmu_enable(void)
raw_write_sctlr_el3(sctlr);
isb();
}
-
-/*
- * CAUTION: This implementation assumes that coreboot never uses non-identity
- * page tables for pages containing executed code. If you ever want to violate
- * this assumption, have fun figuring out the associated problems on your own.
- */
-void mmu_disable(void)
-{
- dcache_clean_invalidate_all();
- uint32_t sctlr = raw_read_sctlr_el3();
- sctlr &= ~(SCTLR_C | SCTLR_M);
- raw_write_sctlr_el3(sctlr);
- isb();
-}