| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Sandy and Ivy Bridge processors use the same socket, and a mainboard
with the socket can support both types of CPUs. However, they use
different native graphics init code for LVDS and cause a crash if
running the wrong code.
This change detects the CPU type and then selects the right code to
run. It will add some more code in ramstage. It also merges the
{SANDY,IVY}BRIDGE_LVDS symbol to one SANDYBRIDGE_IVYBRIDGE_LVDS.
Tested on a Lenovo T520 with i7-2630qm and i7-3720qm
Signed-off-by: Iru Cai <mytbk920423@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I4624759f9c92d56d547db1ab4b9a1d611a182a91
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12087
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Tested by making lenovo x230 configurable despite pretty MRC bugs.
Change-Id: Ia2a123f24334f5cd5f42473b7ce7f3d77c0e65b7
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
In the same time remove few native gfx options which were improperly set
and only added dead code to the binary.
Change-Id: I4ed3fec03a1655ae0a779c3aa3845de273cb12e1
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13649
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Those are actually board specific. Keep the old value as defaults,
though. The defaults are included by all affected boards.
Change-Id: Ib865c7b4274f2ea3181a89fc52701b740f9bab7d
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11705
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
Only one value would work with corresponding gma code currently (which one
depends on board). Going forward, it's possible to compute which number can
be used, so there is no need to keep this info around.
Change-Id: Iadc77ef94b02f892860e3ae8d70a0a792758565d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11862
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Based on the info by Felix Held.
Change-Id: Iab84dd8a0e3c942da20a6e21db5510e4ad16cadd
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11857
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
This is a sad story. We have three different code paths for
sandybridge and ivybridge: proper native path, google MRC path, and,
everyone's favorite: Intel FSP path. For the purpose of this patch,
the FSP path lives in its own little world, and doesn't concern us.
Since MRC was first, when native files and variables were added, they
were suffixed with "_native" to separate them from the existing code.
This can cause confusion, as the suffix might make the native files
seem parasitical.
This has been bothering me for many months. MRC should be the
parasitical path, especially since we fully support native init, and
it works more reliably, on a wider range of hardware. There have been
a few board ports that never made it to coreboot.org because MRC would
hang.
gigabyte/ga-b75m-d3h is a prime example: it did not work with MRC, so
the effort was abandoned at first. Once the native path became
available, the effort was restarted and the board is now supported.
In honor of the hackers and pioneers who made the native code
possible, rename things so that their effort is the first class
citizen.
Change-Id: Ic86cee5e00bf7f598716d3d15d1ea81ca673932f
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11788
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
|
|
This should be able to generate bootable ports for sandy/ivy, possible with
minor fixes. Howto is in readme.md
Change-Id: Ia126cf0939ef2dc2cdbb7ea100d2b63ea6b02f28
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7131
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
|
