| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Icc128212c1f72beb50caca671b4bada3507d3a1f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50520
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Memlayout is a mechanism to define memory areas outside the normal
program segment constructed by the linker. Therefore, it generally
doesn't make sense to relocate memlayout symbols when the program is
relocated. They tend to refer to things that are always in one specific
spot, independent of where the program is loaded.
This hasn't really hurt us in the past because the use case we have for
rmodules (ramstage on x86) just happens to not really need to refer to
any memlayout-defined areas at the moment. But that use case may come up
in the future so it's still worth fixing.
This patch declares all memlayout-defined symbols as ABSOLUTE() in the
linker, which is then reflected in the symbol table of the generated
ELF. We can then use that distinction to have rmodtool skip them when
generating the relocation table for an rmodule. (Also rearrange rmodtool
a little to make the primary string table more easily accessible to the
rest of the code, so we can refer to symbol names in debug output.)
A similar problem can come up with userspace unit tests, but we cannot
modify the userspace relocation toolchain (and for unfortunate
historical reasons, it tries to relocate even absolute symbols). We'll
just disable PIC and make those binaries fully static to avoid that
issue.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ic51d9add3dc463495282b365c1b6d4a9bf11dbf2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50629
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Clang doesn't seem to get along with some of the symbol magic we use for
memlayout and throws -Winline-asm warnings. Since we want to be
compatible with as many host compilers as possible (within reason),
let's disable that warning.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If1d88ed0bb2d10acfadcf8dec74fa3d227e0f790
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50825
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
|
|
The current test framework builds the test code without any warnings at
all, which isn't great -- we have already slipped in some cases of
non-void functions not returning a defined value, for example. It would
likely be overkill to try to use all the same warnings we use for normal
coreboot code (e.g. some stuff like -Wmissing-prototypes makes cmocka's
__wrap_xxx() mock functions unnecessarily cumbersome to work with, and
other things like -Wvla may be appropriate for firmware but is probably
too aggressive for some simple test code). Therefore, let's just add
some of the stuff that points out the most obvious errors.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4d9801f52a8551f55f419f4141dc21ccb835d676
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42259
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
|
|
So far, the semantics have been that run-unit-tests stopped at the first
test suite that failed. This hides useful signal in later tests, so
always run all tests and collect the result.
Change-Id: I407715f85513c2c95a1cf89cfb427317dff9fbab
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41773
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iab0c4250b1baa77d4eab7538ec1fd3310f9e63e4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41771
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
|
|
Put it in $(objutil) so that it's shared between board builds with
abuild even if that doesn't matter right now.
Change-Id: I5670d9b661891262ad936980f63fa93b07c27e95
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41770
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Relying on Cmocka packages, which are provided with different OS
distributions, may introduce some problems with setup environments
across developers (e.g. library version mismatch). Instead, let's build
Cmocka from source code, which is now added to git submodules as
3rdparty/cmocka.
Please note, that cmake tool is required for building Cmocka (thus also
coreboot unit tests).
Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Ia947c5c60d5c58b76acebe4b614dd427ef995950
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This patch adds a basic test for the common region and region_device
APIs, sanity checking the basic functions and things like
overflow-handling. There is certainly more that could be added here, but
it's a start.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4932402f54768557e5b22b16e66220bd90ddebfd
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41046
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
<cmocka.h> requires a few standard headers to be explicitly included
before itself or it will throw compilation errors. Having to always
include these headers in the right order in every test is cumbersome.
Instead, this patch encapsulates the problem in a new <tests/test.h>
header that all tests should include (instead of <cmocka.h> directly).
Also fix --gc-sections in the test framework which needs to be passed
for linking, not for compiling.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4284d74c8673708e21a5266eb42f7b9ae19a1b12
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41045
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Dabros
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add a subsystem which will be used for writing, building and running
unit tests for different coreboot's modules. This work is built using
Cmocka unit testing framework. Description of what unit testing means
(for the author) and how unit testing framework evaluation was performed
may be found in Documentation/technotes/2020-03-unit-testing-coreboot.md
Makefiles structure is very similar to this used for building coreboot
images. Every directory has its own Makefile.inc were tests' names,
sources, subdirs and multiple other test-related attributes are defined
in form of variables.
Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I9b0220b84b9a6e448476ca3eb3ccccc5fb829ad1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39894
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
