| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Unit-tests had more strict warning setings than main build. Sometimes it
can cause unit-tests builds to fail even if code compiles correctly when
building normal coreboot image.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Ia219ccc8631b069436497eb45a1552a0910f7aa1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67453
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@coreboot.org>
|
|
Consistent with real build process, it retains more potential to
detect the build environment.
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Change-Id: I46f2fe04bf1b8c1ca6476f05555114fa1ef2a96e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65728
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch is based on similar changes [1] done in Depthcharge projects,
which aimed to provide unified way to build host-side programs for
testing internal code. New test tools might benefit from it by having
same base code as unit-tests.
[1] https://crrev.com/c/3412108
TEST=make unit-tests
TEST=COV=1 make unit-tests coverage-report
Signed-off-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: Iac4517ab6146fa3f2d2b7a20df54601ab2d04c3d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63637
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
