| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add UDK 2015 Bindings for FSP header compatibility.
These bindings add the necessary code to read FSP Headers
without any modifications from FSP Source.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:54100
BRANCH=none
TEST=built coreboot image and verified boot
Change-Id: I2887f55b6e63cd0a2b2add9a521be9cfaf875e7d
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16307
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I1bd33e423b0fcb69597e001b61c6ea916f5fe44a
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14622
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
|
|
Since this code is pulled in through commonlib, it will break compilation
of cbfstool on OSX.
Change-Id: I342bfa7e755aa540c4563bb5cd8cccacee39d188
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13525
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:
1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
near impossible to forward declare structs.
The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).
The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
selects. No other bindings are currently available,
but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
include path. This split can allow a version 2,
for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
(fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
the FSP relocation code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change the FrameBufferSize field from UINT64 to UINT32 to match the
Platform Initialization 2.4 specification.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on cyan
Change-Id: I28dc0608675ed5840863ecd15bd2f57e6b2f4c1d
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakllsch@kollasch.net>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add new GUID for FSP.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on strago
Change-Id: I539a59b513f67535436f581e0a79ab53f05682ca
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10587
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Only define the ASSERT macro when it is not already defined. This
change allows the UEFI/FSP definitions to be included with most other
coreboot includes.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on sklrvp
Change-Id: Iccfeb83eb1e52623ae0a0fe2a96b587ce61f82d7
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10334
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
As the first step in adding support for FSP 1.1, add common header files
for EDK2. Internally FSP is based upon EDK2 and uses the defines and
data structures within these files for its interface.
These files come from revision 16227 of the open source EDK2 tree at
https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2. These files are
provided in an EDK2 style tree to allow direct comparison with the EDK2
tree.
Updates may be done manually to these files but only to support FSP 1.1
on UEFI 2.4. A uefi_2.5 tree should be added in the future as FSP
binaries migrate to UEFI 2.5.
Note: All the files were modified to use Linux line termination.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for Braswell or Skylake boards using FSP 1.1.
Change-Id: Ide5684b7eb6392e12f9f2f24215f5370c2d47c70
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9943
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
