| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add new Kconfig symbols to mark FSP binary as x86_32.
Fix the FSP headers and replace void pointers by fixed sized integers
depending on the used mode to compile the FSP.
This issue has been reported here:
https://github.com/intel/FSP/issues/59
This is necessary to run on x86_64, as pointers have different size.
Add preprocessor error to warn that x86_64 FSP isn't supported by the
current code.
Tested on Intel Skylake. FSP-M no longer returns the error "Invalid
Parameter".
Change-Id: I6015005c4ee3fc2f361985cf8cff896bcefd04fb
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48174
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Convert 0X -> 0x
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iea3ca67908135d0e85083a05bad2ea176ca34095
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44926
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
I just got hit by a double-evaluation bug again, it's time to attempt
to fix this once more. Unfortunately there are several issues that don't
make this easy:
- bitfield variables don't support typeof()
- local macro variables that shadow others trigger -Werror=shadow
- sign warnings with integer literal and unsigned var in typeof-MIN()
- ({ statement expressions }) can not be used outside functions
- romcc doesn't support any of the fancy GCC/clang extensions
This patch tries to address all of them as far as possible with macro
magic. We don't have the technology to solve the bitfield and
non-function context issues yet (__builtin_choose_expr() still throws a
"no statement expression outside a function" error if it's only in the
branch that's not chosen, unfortunately), so we'll have to provide
alternative macros for use in those cases (and we'll avoid making
__ALIGN_MASK() double-evaluation safe for now, since it would be
annoying to do that there and having an alignment mask with side
effects seems very unlikely). romcc can continue using unsafe versions
since we're hopefully not writing a lot of new code for it. Sign
warnings can be avoided in literal/variable comparisons by always using
the type of the variable there. Shadowing is avoided by picking very
explicit local variable names and using a special __COUNTER__ solution
for MIN() and MAX() (the only ones of these you're likely to nest).
Also add DIV_ROUND_UP() to libpayload since it's a generally quite
useful thing to have.
Change-Id: Iea35156c9aa9f6f2c7b8f00991418b746f44315d
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32027
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
find src -type f "!" -regex ".*\.\(vbt\|bin\)" -exec sed -i -e "s,\s\+$,,g" {} \;
Change-Id: Ic70cf8524dcd0a0f5700f91b704b3c545dd8a01a
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30959
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I179264ee6681a7ba4488b9f1c6bce1a19b4e1772
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30160
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch includes (edk2/UDK2017) all required headers for UDK2017
from EDK2 github project using below command
>> git clone https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git vUDK2017
commit hash: 66833b2a87d98be8d81d1337c193bcbf0de47d47
Change-Id: If0d5a3fef016c67e9eed6aed9b698b3b13b930c4
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23425
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
