coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2014-05-19	build: move include paths where they belong	Patrick Georgi
	They're _not_ part of the compiler binary, so they have no place in $(CC_*) Change-Id: I1e1c3c0be6f75629450a824ea834e1614d48ed9b Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5785 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-05-06	Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot	Furquan Shaikh
	Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain and compiler flags for every stage. These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile. In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others. Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler. Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of the stage being compiled. We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are associated with each of the stages. Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-04-11	Update vendorcode/intel/makefile for coming FSPs	Martin Roth
	Other FSPs have more than just the initial fsphob.c source file. Add any .c files in the srx directory to the ramstage build. Change-Id: I5118bdcca44935b579809c4fc9566ab7914a6e4b Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5454 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
2013-12-04	Add Intel FSP northbridge support Sandybridge and Ivybridge	Marc Jones
	Add support for Sandybridge and Ivybridge using the Intel FSP. The FSP is different enough to warrant its own source files. This source handle the majority of FSP interaction. "Intel® Firmware Support Package (Intel® FSP) provides key programming information for initializing Intel® silicon and can be easily integrated into a boot loader of the developer’s choice. It is easy to adopt, scalable to design, reduces time-to-market, and is economical to build." http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-firmware-support-package/intel-fsp-overview.html Change-Id: Ib879c6b0fbf2eb1cbf929a87f592df29ac48bcc5 Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4015 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>