Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Add UDK 2015 Bindings for FSP header compatibility.
These bindings add the necessary code to read FSP Headers
without any modifications from FSP Source.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:54100
BRANCH=none
TEST=built coreboot image and verified boot
Change-Id: I2887f55b6e63cd0a2b2add9a521be9cfaf875e7d
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16307
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This symbol was added to fix a Kconfig lint error after the
Broadwell DE vendorcode was added. Now that the chipset's in
the codebase, it's no longer needed.
Change-Id: Iedb166129c9265cc2cfcc406d98bde92c1a82d2f
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14384
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
The Kconfig lint tool is complaining because this symbol doesn't
exist. Create a temporary definition that can be removed when
the chipset is added.
Change-Id: I6a8abffcc91773aae16721ee1f48c4c64bd6b486
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14091
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Initial vendor codes to support Broadwell-DE SoC. This is FSP 1.0 based
project and is based on Broadwell-DE Gold release. Change has been
verified on Intel Camelback Mountain CRB.
Change-Id: I9262c9d70a58f0c7427f0658948adf080f2f6d8f
Signed-off-by: York Yang <york.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14030
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
The Intel i89xx is a communications chipset that pairs with
Sandy(Ivy)bridge processors. It has a lot in common with
the bd82x6x chipset, but fewer devices and options.
Change-Id: I11bcd1edc80f72a1b2521def9be0d1bde5789a79
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12166
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Please don't remove chipsets and mainboards without discussion and input
from the owners. Someone was asking about cougar canyon 2 just a couple
of weeks ago - there's obviously still interest.
This reverts commit fb50124d22014742b6990a95df87a7a828e891b6.
Change-Id: Icd7dcea21fa4a7808b25bb8727020701aeebffc9
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12128
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This chip is still being used and should not have been deleted. It's
a current intel chip, and doesn't even require an ME binary.
This reverts commit 959478a763c16688d43752adbae2c76e7764da45.
Change-Id: I78594871f87af6e882a245077b59727e15f8021a
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11860
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
mohonpeak is the reference board for Rangeley. I doubt anyone uses it
or cares about it. We jokingly refer to it as "Moron Peak". It's code
with no known users, so we shouldn't be hauling it around for the
eventuality that someone might use it in the future.
Change-Id: Id3c9fc39e1b98707d96a95f2a914de6bbb31c615
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11790
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
|
|
We already have two other code paths for this silicon. Maintaining the
FSP path as well doesn't make much sense. There was only one board to
use this code, and it's a reference board that I doubt anyone still
owns or uses.
Change-Id: I4fcfa6c56448416624fd26418df19b354eb72f39
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11789
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
|
|
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:
1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
near impossible to forward declare structs.
The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).
The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
selects. No other bindings are currently available,
but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
include path. This split can allow a version 2,
for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
(fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
the FSP relocation code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The SOUTHBRIDGE_INTEL_FSP_I89XX symbols are never defined in any Kconfig
file or used anywhere in the existing coreboot tree. Removing them as
unnecessary. If the southbridge code ever gets uploaded, these can be
re-added at that point.
Change-Id: I36f9ca8e25e08ce154d10ea9d764a73095590244
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10436
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
Prepare for FSP 1.1 integration by moving the FSP to a FSP 1.0 specific
directory. See follow-on patches for sharing of common code.
Change-Id: Ic58cb4074c65b91d119909132a012876d7ee7b74
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9970
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Minor change in Kconfig to remove "/" defined in
FSP_VENDORCODE_HEADER_PATH and update the path in Makefile.inc.
Change-Id: Ic19ab9560aabe307d45b560f167874383cc920aa
Signed-off-by: Fei Wang <wangfei.jimei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: FEI WANG <wangfei.jimei@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5894
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
These are the .h and .c files from Intel that support interaction
with the FSP. These have been modified from the FSP distribution
only to strip trailing whitespace.
Intel® Firmware Support Package for Intel® Atom™ Processor C2000
Product Family (Formerly Rangeley)
"Intel® Firmware Support Package (Intel® FSP) provides key
programming information for initializing Intel® silicon and can be
easily integrated into a boot loader of the developer’s choice.
It is easy to adopt, scalable to design, reduces time-to-market, and
is economical to build."
http://www.intel.com/fsp
Change-Id: I9ed94cb92909c3681cc88bf10b85a9ba25e8fc55
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5457
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
These are the .h and .c files from Intel that support interaction
with the FSP. These have been modified from the FSP distribution
only to strip trailing whitespace.
Intel® Atom™ processor E3800 product family (formerly Bay Trail)
"Intel® Firmware Support Package (Intel® FSP) provides key
programming information for initializing Intel® silicon and can be
easily integrated into a boot loader of the developer’s choice.
It is easy to adopt, scalable to design, reduces time-to-market, and
is economical to build."
http://www.intel.com/fsp
Change-Id: I0fa64dbaf640493cdb5e670e8d213a49d9e7dcfb
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5456
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
These are the .h and .c files from Intel that support interaction
with the FSP. These have been modified from the FSP distribution
only to strip trailing whitespace.
Intel® Firmware Support Package for Intel® Xeon® E3-1125C v2,
E3-1105C v2, Intel® Pentium® Processor B925C, and Intel® Core™
i3-3115C Processors for Communications Infrastructure with
Intel® Communications Chipset 89xx Series Platform Controller Hub
(formerly Crystal Forest Refresh: Ivy Bridge Gladden and Cave Creek
"Intel® Firmware Support Package (Intel® FSP) provides key
programming information for initializing Intel® silicon and can be
easily integrated into a boot loader of the developer’s choice.
It is easy to adopt, scalable to design, reduces time-to-market, and
is economical to build."
http://www.intel.com/fsp
Change-Id: Ib76e89b2d2f6407cf55a5a664da989c7a7e0eb23
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5455
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
Add support for Sandybridge and Ivybridge using the Intel FSP.
The FSP is different enough to warrant its own source files.
This source handle the majority of FSP interaction.
"Intel® Firmware Support Package (Intel® FSP) provides key
programming information for initializing Intel® silicon and can be
easily integrated into a boot loader of the developer’s choice.
It is easy to adopt, scalable to design, reduces time-to-market, and
is economical to build."
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-firmware-support-package/intel-fsp-overview.html
Change-Id: Ib879c6b0fbf2eb1cbf929a87f592df29ac48bcc5
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4015
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|