| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I8a39e862176cd1c8a14424eb6d2bf7edabd36adb
Found-by: Silvio Cesare, https://twitter.com/silviocesare/status/1268784333029965824
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42101
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Until now, the buildOpts.c files were primarily made out of copy-pasted
AGESA options, commented-out definitions and several useless comments;
that is, the materialization of technical debt in GCC-parsable form...
Until now.
It is assumed that the boards in the tree still boot. So, by comparing
their settings, we can extract saner defaults to place into AGESA. Many
of the settings were common across all boards of the same family, so we
promote those values to default settings. In some cases flipping a flag
was required, so the macros to alter that option had to be adapted as
well. Since those AGESA versions are expected to never receive updates,
it should not be a problem to change their files to suit our needs.
As a result, all but two buildOpts.c files now have less than 100 lines.
AGESA f14 boards need less than 50 lines, and f15tn/f16kb just require
about 60 or 70 lines in those files. Hopefully, this will make porting
more mainboards using AGESA f14/f15tn/f16kb a substantially easier task.
TEST=Use abuild --timeless to check that all AGESA f14/f15tn/f16kb
mainboards result in identical coreboot binaries.
Change-Id: Ife1ca5177d85441b9a7b24d64d7fcbabde6e0409
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41667
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Banon <mikebdp2@gmail.com>
|
|
These variables are declared to be arrays of MICROCODE_PATCHES_4K (which
is a struct containing a UINT8 array). However, the actual definitions
of these arrays ignore the wrapping struct and just use the underlying
UINT8 arrays directly, which causes a compiler error when using LTO
because of the type mismatch. Fix the type declaration so that it
matches.
Change-Id: I6bef27507092fe72fe2f836c427ebb2c19009e78
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40436
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Implicit fall throughs are a perpetual source of bugs and Coverity Scan
issues, so let's squash them once and for all. GCC can flag implicit fall
throughs using the -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning, and this should
ensure no more enter the code base. However, many fall throughs are
intentional, and we can use the following comment style to have GCC
suppress the warning.
switch (x) {
case 1:
y += 1;
/* fall through */
case 2:
y += 2;
/* fall through - but this time with an explanation */
default:
y += 3;
}
This patch adds comments for all remaining intentional fall throughs,
and tweaks some existing fall through comments to fit the syntax that
GCC expects.
Change-Id: I1d75637a434a955a58d166ad203e49620d7395ed
Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34297
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
This microcode update for CPU ID 0x700F01 improves system stability:
in particular, fixes Xen hardware virtualization freezes. Also it attempts to
patch some Spectre-related security vulnerabilities. This new microcode has been
tested by multiple coreboot community members and found working perfectly.
Old version: 0x700010B [2013-07-09]
replaced by
New version: 0x7000110 [2018-02-09]
Change-Id: Iebe6e54d922378a8a1feb97f37b08ac50c8234b2
Signed-off-by: Mike Banon <mikebdp2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/28370
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch fixes up all code that would throw a -Wtype-limits warning.
This sometimes involves eliminating unnecessary checks, adding a few odd
but harmless casts or just pragma'ing out the warning for a whole file
-- I tried to find the path of least resistance. I think the overall
benefit of the warning outweighs the occasional weirdness.
Change-Id: Iacd37eb1fad388d9db7267ceccb03e6dcf1ad0d2
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32537
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I81985bd2836bdeb369587f170504a8a048ee496b
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29196
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Fix (assumed) regression with commit
ac63b41 vendorcode/amd/agesa: Fix variable length array declaration
The code used sizeof() on the struct where array length was
previously adjusted, but only f14 case was fixed accordingly.
Change-Id: Ib83660d5e102e13b4ffad19fb78f695ac4a871dc
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26036
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Definition of S_PSTATE only allowed PStateStruct[0], while it is
effectively used as a flexible array. Since sizeof(S_PSTATE) is
reduced here by sizeof(S_PSTATE_VALUES), we have to account for
that when calculating PStateLevelingSizeOfBytes.
In S_PSTATE context, PStateStruct[PStateMaxValue] is valid reference.
GCC 7.2.0 warns about an out of bounds array subscript.
```
CC libagesa/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.o
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.c: In function 'PStateLevelingMain':
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f14/Proc/CPU/Feature/cpuPstateLeveling.c:524:65: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
PStateBufferPtrTmp->PStateCoreStruct[0].PStateStruct[k].PStateEnable = 0;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
Change-Id: If9598a951c6b882432689b677a956c44650c7083
Found-by: gcc (Debian 7.2.0-2) 7.2.0
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21297
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Id3d9a365469f7d73788cad4095ec3495fc9baf3b
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21263
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
We have been forced to build AGESA with ASSERT() as non-fatal
for some board, as hitting those errors is not uncommon.
For the cases touched here, abort eventlog operations early
to avoid further errors and dereference of null pointers.
Change-Id: I1a09ad55d998502ad19273cfcd8d6588d85d5e0c
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18543
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Implement threshold as described in AMD.h, and do not add
entries below STATUS_LOG_LEVEL in the eventlog.
Change-Id: Ic9e45b1473b4fee46a1ad52d439e8682d961dc03
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18542
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7576591b42fa62da2b3bd74f961fb297b85e250d
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/4806
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I6a0752cf0c0e484e670acca97c4991b5578845fb
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11081
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Remove useless AGESA microcode macro that leads to unused variable
warnings.
Change-Id: Ia21bfc758f81e349bdd0bfd185df75e8b1898336
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Frodin <dave.frodin@se-eng.com>
|
|
_CPU_L3_FEATIRES_H -> _CPU_L3_FEATURES_H
Spotted by Clang
Change-Id: I1eabebffc7fd5e4f37b28dabcd28984bed64acd8
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5818
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
The platform initialization (PI) code v1.0.0.7 for Kabini has some
enhancements like ECC DIMM support, new CPU microcode rev 0700010B, FCH
bug fix (RTC) and so on.
Use the name Kabini instead of Kerala everywhere.
Note, the former PI code was indeed version v1.0.0.0 instead of v0.0.1.0
as used in `AGESA_VERSION_STRING`.
Change-Id: I186de1aef222cd35ea69efa93967a3ffb8da7248
Signed-off-by: WANG Siyuan <SiYuan.Wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: WANG Siyuan <wangsiyuanbuaa@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3935
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Bruce Griffith <Bruce.Griffith@se-eng.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Icb6f64e2e3cfd678fb4fb4f13f0e4b678d5acc4a
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Wang <SiYuan.Wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Wang <wangsiyuanbuaa@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Dill <nick.dill@se-eng.com>
Tested-by: Bruce Griffith <bruce.griffith@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3836
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
|
