| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We've just decided to remove the only known use of the VBSD_SW_WP flag
in vboot (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/575389), since it
was unused and never reliable on all platforms anyway. Therefore, we can
now also remove the coreboot infrastructure that supported it. It
doesn't really hurt anyone, but removing it saves a small bit of effort
for future platforms.
Change-Id: I6706eba2761a73482e03f3bf46343cf1d84f154b
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20628
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch attempts to finish the separation between CONFIG_VBOOT and
CONFIG_CHROMEOS by moving the remaining options and code (including
image generation code for things like FWID and GBB flags, which are
intrinsic to vboot itself) from src/vendorcode/google/chromeos to
src/vboot. Also taking this opportunity to namespace all VBOOT Kconfig
options, and clean up menuconfig visibility for them (i.e. some options
were visible even though they were tied to the hardware while others
were invisible even though it might make sense to change them).
CQ-DEPEND=CL:459088
Change-Id: I3e2e31150ebf5a96b6fe507ebeb53a41ecf88122
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18984
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Currently, src/vboot/bootmode.c gets compiled even if vboot is disabled.
It seems that this was only done to support calling certain
developer/recovery mode functions in this case. There is no reason to
compile the whole file for that -- we can just differentiate with a
stub in the header instead, which is what other parts of coreboot
usually do for cases like this.
Change-Id: If83e1b3e0f34f75c2395b4c464651e373724b2e6
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18982
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has
been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify
it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig
logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to
set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the
latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide
it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be
configurable.)
Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make
sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer
mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also
dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode()
function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will
not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set.
Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that
function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and
must define it, or it doesn't and must not.
In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs
anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC.
Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is
present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by
menuconfig.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701
Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The cbmem_possibly_online() is a helpful construct. Therefore,
push it into cbmem.h so other users can take advantage of it.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:60592
BRANCH=reef
Change-Id: If5a1c7815ed03874dcf141014b8ffefb82b7cc92
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
1. Add new function vboot_recovery_mode_memory_retrain that indicates if
recovery mode requires memory retraining to be performed.
2. Add helper function get_recovery_mode_retrain_switch to read memory
retrain switch. This is provided as weak function which should be
implemented by mainboard just like {get,clear}_recovery_mode_switch.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:59352
BRANCH=None
TEST=Verified behavior of recovery mode with forced memory retraining on
reef
Change-Id: I46c10fbf25bc100d9f562c36da3ac646c9dae7d1
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17241
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
With VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE separated from CHROMEOS, move recovery and
developer mode check functions to vboot. Thus, get rid of the
BOOTMODE_STRAPS option which controlled these functions under src/lib.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:55639
Change-Id: Ia2571026ce8976856add01095cc6be415d2be22e
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
