aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/southbridge/intel/lynxpoint/smi.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-04-01lynxpoint: split clearing and enabling of smmAaron Durbin
Previously southbridge_smm_init() was provided that did both the clearing of the SMM state and enabling SMIs. This is troublesome in how haswell machines bring up the APs. The BSP enters SMM once to determine if parallel SMM relocation is possible. If it is possible the BSP releases the APs to do SMM relocation. Normally, after the APs complete the SMM relocation, the BSP would then re-enter the relocation handler to relocate its own SMM space. However, because SMIs were previously enabled it is possible for an SMI event to occur before the APs are complete or have entered the relocation handler. This is bad because the BSP will turn off parallel SMM save state. Additionally, this is a problem because the relocation handler is not written to handle regular SMIs which can cause an SMI storm which effectively looks like a hung machine. Correct these issues by turning on SMIs after all the SMM relocation has occurred. Change-Id: Id4f07553b110b9664d51d2e670a14e6617591500 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2977 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-21haswell/lynxpoint: Use new PCH/PM helper functionsDuncan Laurie
This makes use of the new functions from pmutil.c that take care of the differences between -H and -LP chipsets. It also adds support for the LynxPoint-LP GPE0 register block and the SMI/SCI routing differences. The FADT is updated to report the new 256 byte GPE0 block on wtm2/wtm2 boards which is too big for the 64bit X_GPE0 address block so that part is zeroed to prevent IASL and the kernel from complaining about a mismatch. This was tested on WTM2. Unfortunately I am still unable to get an SCI delivered from the EC but I suspect that is due to a magic command needed to put the EC in ACPI mode. Instead I verified that all of the power management and GPIO registers were set to expected values. I also tested transitions into S3 and S5 from both the kernel and by pressing the power button at the developer mode screen and they all function as expected. Change-Id: Ice9e798ea5144db228349ce90540745c0780b20a Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2816 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-21lynxpoint: remove DEBUG_PERIODIC_SMISDuncan Laurie
This was put in for debugging and experimentation on i945 and has been copied around since. Drop it from lynxpoint. Change-Id: I0b53f4e1362cd3ce703625ef2b4988139c48b989 Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2814 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-18haswell: Use SMM ModulesAaron Durbin
This commit adds support for using the SMM modules for haswell-based boards. The SMI handling was also refactored to put the relocation handler and permanent SMM handler loading in the cpu directory. All tseg adjustment support is dropped by relying on the SMM module support to perform the necessary relocations. Change-Id: I8dd23610772fc4408567d9f4adf339596eac7b1f Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2728 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-14haswell: Add initial support for Haswell platformsAaron Durbin
The Haswell parts use a PCH code named Lynx Point (Series 8). Therefore, the southbridge support is included as well. The basis for this code is the Sandybridge code. Management Engine, IRQ routing, and ACPI still requires more attention, but this is a good starting point. This code partially gets up through the romstage just before training memory on a Haswell reference board. Change-Id: If572d6c21ca051b486b82a924ca0ffe05c4d0ad4 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2616 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>