| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I916f19e022633b316fbc0c6bf38bbd58228412be
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56218
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
IO MWAIT redirection is not enabled. The code is missing, but C-states
should instead be reported using the _CST ACPI object.
Change-Id: I21fd2fa6ee4aa1ed57694549d5cb48159f37af26
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55217
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I02aa1e2a9a9061b34b91f832d96123a8595d61b7
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44592
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3:
Accesses to the PM1 status registers are done through byte or word
accesses.
The same is said about the PM1 Enable registers. Therefore, reporting
dword-sized access is wrong and means nothing anyway. Since some other
platforms use word-sized access, use word everywhere for consistency.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: I6f85c9a4126f37ab2a193c3ab50a6c8e62cf6515
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43432
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Packard Bell MS2290 does not change.
Change-Id: If0ee1b65a1be67ee9f5f832f076c365017a14e6a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43429
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
All supported x86 chips select HAVE_CF9_RESET, and also use 0xcf9 as
reset register in FADT. How unsurprising. We might as well use that
information to automatically fill in the FADT accordingly. So, do it.
To avoid having x86-specific code under arch-agnostic `acpi/`, create a
new optional `arch_fill_fadt` function, and override it for x86 systems.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ib436b04aafd66c3ddfa205b870c1e95afb3e846d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43389
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
|
|
They are ignored if the ACPI_FADT_WBINVD flag is set, which is required
on current ACPI versions and only maintained for ACPI 1.0 compatibility.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ief1219542ba71d18153b64180e0ff60bd1e7687b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43390
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
Instead, just flip the desired bits using bitwise operations. As this is
initially zero, the resulting value is the same. This allows flags to be
set from anywhere regardless of execution order.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Icfd580a20524936cd0adac574331b09fb2aea925
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43387
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
None of the currently-supported chips has PM1b_EVT nor PM1b_CNT event
register blocks. According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3,
sections 4.8.1.1 and 4.8.1.2 (PM1 Event/Control Registers):
If the PM1b_EVT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
If the PM1b_CNT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with PM1b for now. So, drop unneeded writes to PM1b fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iff788b2ff17ba190a8dd9b0b540f1ef059a1a0ea
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43380
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
None of the currently-supported chips has a GPE1 block. The ACPI spec,
version 6.3, section 4.8.1.6 (General-Purpose Event Registers) says:
If a generic register block is not supported then its respective
block pointer and block length values in the FADT table contain zeros.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with GPE1 for now. So, drop the unneeded writes to GPE1 fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iefc4bbc6e16fac12e0a9324d5a50b20aad59a6cd
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43379
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Other Intel southbridges do this.
Change-Id: I8306295fb87776aab5ed0e56e1a9c480c65fe3c6
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43372
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
|
