| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Ic8b0e6404a3f90312f7d2d3b6c367b0a1d9ec6e2
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20460
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Icfc35b73bacb60b1f21e71e70ad4418ec3e644f6
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16291
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
the prefix was introduced in the early v2 tree many years ago
because our old build system "newconfig" could not handle two files with
the same name in different paths like /path/to/usb.c and
/another/path/to/usb.c correctly. Only one of the files would end up
being compiled into the final image.
Since Kconfig (actually since shortly before we switched to Kconfig) we
don't suffer from that problem anymore. So we could drop the sb700_
prefix from all those filenames (or, the <componentname>_ prefix in general)
- makes it easier to fork off a new chipset
- makes it easier to diff against other chipsets
- storing redundant information in filenames seems wrong
Signed-off-by: <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6149 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
