| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3:
Accesses to the PM1 status registers are done through byte or word
accesses.
The same is said about the PM1 Enable registers. Therefore, reporting
dword-sized access is wrong and means nothing anyway. Since some other
platforms use word-sized access, use word everywhere for consistency.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: I6f85c9a4126f37ab2a193c3ab50a6c8e62cf6515
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43432
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
All supported x86 chips select HAVE_CF9_RESET, and also use 0xcf9 as
reset register in FADT. How unsurprising. We might as well use that
information to automatically fill in the FADT accordingly. So, do it.
To avoid having x86-specific code under arch-agnostic `acpi/`, create a
new optional `arch_fill_fadt` function, and override it for x86 systems.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ib436b04aafd66c3ddfa205b870c1e95afb3e846d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43389
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
|
|
They are ignored if the ACPI_FADT_WBINVD flag is set, which is required
on current ACPI versions and only maintained for ACPI 1.0 compatibility.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Ief1219542ba71d18153b64180e0ff60bd1e7687b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43390
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
Instead, just flip the desired bits using bitwise operations. As this is
initially zero, the resulting value is the same. This allows flags to be
set from anywhere regardless of execution order.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Icfd580a20524936cd0adac574331b09fb2aea925
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43387
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
None of the currently-supported chips has PM1b_EVT nor PM1b_CNT event
register blocks. According to the ACPI specification, version 6.3,
sections 4.8.1.1 and 4.8.1.2 (PM1 Event/Control Registers):
If the PM1b_EVT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
If the PM1b_CNT_BLK is not supported, its pointer contains a value of
zero in the FADT.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with PM1b for now. So, drop unneeded writes to PM1b fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iff788b2ff17ba190a8dd9b0b540f1ef059a1a0ea
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43380
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
None of the currently-supported chips has a GPE1 block. The ACPI spec,
version 6.3, section 4.8.1.6 (General-Purpose Event Registers) says:
If a generic register block is not supported then its respective
block pointer and block length values in the FADT table contain zeros.
Since the FADT struct defaults to zero in coreboot, we don't need to do
anything with GPE1 for now. So, drop the unneeded writes to GPE1 fields.
Tested on Asus P8Z77-V LX2 with Linux 5.7.6 and Windows 10 at the end of
the patch train, both operating systems are able to boot successfully.
Change-Id: Iefc4bbc6e16fac12e0a9324d5a50b20aad59a6cd
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43379
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Found using:
diff <(git grep -l '#include <string.h>' -- src/) <(git grep -l 'STRINGIFY\|memcpy\|memmove\|memset\|memcmp\|memchr\|strdup\|strconcat\|strnlen\|strlen\|strchr\|strncpy\|strcpy\|strcmp\|strncmp\|strspn\|strcspn\|strtok_r\|strtok\|atol\|strrchr\|skip_atoi\|snprintf' -- src/) |grep -v vendorcode |grep '<'
Change-Id: I12802d0a6254b2fa39d59f485008bb2012f7b32d
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41913
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Getac P470 remains identical.
Change-Id: I930de15a6746936fa4a8f6db280b5ac60176c836
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42652
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
Change the order of the assignments to match that of i82801ix. This
changes the binary but the effective result should be the same.
Change-Id: Id720fce40e751295e629585d34017f10af2b5c7c
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42651
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
At least i82801ix and i82801jx do this.
Change-Id: I7ff2459d82eb7933ed80180a69f0f323b8ecd25f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42650
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
