| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The name lapic_cluster is a bit misleading, since the construct is not local
APIC specific by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more
generic about our naming. This will allow us to support non-x86 systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Icd7f5fcf6f54d242eabb5e14ee151eec8d6cceb1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2377
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Made using coccinelle:
@@
expression E;
@@
-(E + 7) & -8
+ALIGN(E, 8)
@@
expression E;
@@
-(E + 15) & -16
+ALIGN(E, 16)
Change-Id: I071d2c98cd95580d7de21d256c31b6368a3dc70b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/910
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I0c138ebfdc6d4d5ae7d3512b0dd68df20485690e
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/262
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
|
|
> Definitively a iasl problem, it can't even disassemble it's own
> output back to something equivalent to the input file.
> It seems to be generating Bytecode for the Add where it shouldn't.
Here is a solution using the SSDT.
Unfortunately iasl does not resolve simple arithmetic at compile
time, so we can not use Add(DEFAULT_PMBASE, PCNTRL) in the
Processor statement.
This patch instead dynamically generates the processor statement.
I can't use the speedstep generate_cpu_entries() directly since the
cpu doesn't support speedstep.
For now the code is in the southbridge directory, but maybe it
should go into cpu/intel/ somewhere.
IIRC notebook cpus of the era can already have speedstep, so it
would probably be possible to pair the i82371eb with a
speedstep-capable cpu...
Also, I don't know if multiprocessor boards (abit bp6?) would need
to be handled differently.
Abuild-tested.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+coreboot@tdiedrich.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6153 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
I cleaned up the patch and moved most of the dsdt.dsl and
acpi_tables.c into the southbrige/northbridge directory.
Updated patch should fix abuild error and incorporates suggestions
on irc by uwe (thanks for the comments).
Thanks to Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com> for the original patch.
Tested:
Linux (poweroff, powerbutton event)
XP (poweroff, powerbutton event)
Abuild-tested
Signed-off-by: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+coreboot@tdiedrich.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coreboot.org>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6127 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
