coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2019-01-14	mb/lenovo/[xtz]60: Introduce and use RCBA64 macro	Peter Lemenkov
	Change-Id: I85ca631dfb01acb92dd1ac38dff07215114cab8c Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30802 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
2019-01-14	sb/intel: Use common RCBA MACROs	Peter Lemenkov
	This commit follows up on commit 2e464cf3 with Change-Id I61fb3b01ff15ba2da2ee938addfa630c282c9870. Change-Id: Iaf06d347e2da5680816b17f49523ac1a687798ba Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29236 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: David Guckian Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2018-06-21	sb/intel/common: Make RCBA manipulation MACROs common	Arthur Heymans
	No Change in BUILD_TIMELESS. Change-Id: I634526269d45ebdc6c31cdc28d9ec846b397211d Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27041 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2018-06-21	Revert "sb/intel/{bd82x6,ibexpeak}: Move RCBA macros to a common location"	Arthur Heymans
	In the end it does not look like RCBA register offsets are fully compatible over southbridges. This reverts commit d2d2aef6a3222af909183fb96dc7bc908fac3cd4. Is squashed with revert of "sb/intel/common: Fix conflicting OIC register definition" 8aaa00401b68e5c5b6c07b0984e3e7c3027e3c2f. Change-Id: Icbf4db8590e60573c8c11385835e0231cf8d63e6 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27038 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2018-03-02	sb/intel/common: Fix conflicting OIC register definition	Nico Huber
	Commit d2d2aef6a3 (sb/intel/{bd82x6,ibexpeak}: Move RCBA macros to a common location) makes some platforms use the wrong OIC register defi- nition. It was extended to 16-bit in the corporate version of ICH10. So let's give the new size and location a new name: EOIC (extended OIC). This only touches the systems affected by the mentioned change. Other platforms still need to be adapted before they can use the common RCBA definitions. Change-Id: If9e554c072f01412164dc35e0b09272142e3796f Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/24924 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bill XIE <persmule@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
2018-02-27	sb/intel/{bd82x6,ibexpeak}: Move RCBA macros to a common location	Arthur Heymans
	Many generations of Intel hardware have identical code concerning the RCBA. Change-Id: I33ec6801b115c0d64de1d2a0dc5d439186f3580a Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23287 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>