|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
* SATA initialization.
* USB initialization.
* HDA initialization.
* LPC initialization.
* IDE initialization.
* SMBUS initialization.
Note:
1. I tried to add the description of every step to the code. For example,
if it is made based on rpr, section 2.4.5, I will pasted the words
from 2.4.5 to the c code. But the document I worked with might be
different with the most updated one. A new section has been added and
the 2.4.5 might be changed to 2.5.5. That migh lead to confusing. I
correct every comment if I met one. But I have to confess that I am so
reluctant to find out everyone. I believe it will be correct in the long
run.
2. I only test the SATA port 0-3. The ports 4, 5 are "PATA emulations".
I am confused about it.
3. This patch is not only about SB700. Actually it should be
SB7x0. But I dont think it is nice to change everything to
SB7x0. It is ugly, isn't it. As far as I know, they all use the
same code with revision checking. If you guys think it is
appropriate, please modify it to sb7x0.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5218 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
