| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Southbridge SP5100 support was compiled with SB700 code, but static
device info structure would use sp5100/chip.h. To solve this drop
support for separate chip sp5100 and adjust the relevant Kconfig
options.
Removes chip directory:
src/southbridge/amd/sp5100/
Rename Kconfig option
from: SOUTHBRIDGE_AMD_SP5100
to: SOUTHBRIDGE_AMD_SUBTYPE_SP5100
Change-Id: I873c6ad3624ee69165da6ab7287dfb7e006ee8e8
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/679
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
|
|
No in-tree board using that chipset has it not selected, so move
selection from boards to southbridge.
Change-Id: I7a7a1919b7a555156b8da21e8db7dd8f682d68e1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/661
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This change removes CONFIG_TINY_BOOTBLOCK, CONFIG_BIG_BOOTBLOCK, and
all their uses, assuming TINY_BOOTBLOCK=y, BIG_BOOTBLOCK=n.
This might break a couple of boards on runtime, but so far, fixes were
quite simple.
There's a flag day: Code that relies on CONFIG_TINY_BOOTBLOCK must be
adapted.
Change-Id: I1e17a4a1b9c9adb8b43ca4db8aed5a6d44d645f5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/320
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Since the SB700 has changed to sb7xx_51xx, change legacy name in
other mainboard.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6463 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6178 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
Factor out the ROM decode enable functionality into bootblock.c and
handle it via the usual TINY_BOOTBLOCK mechanism.
Use "select TINY_BOOTBLOCK" in the southbridge, not individual boards.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6159 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
- move EHCI_BAR and EHCI_DEBUG_OFFSET to Kconfig to be set by USB debug port enabled southbridges
- drop USB debug code includes from romstage.cs and use romstage-srcs in the build system instead
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick.georgi@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5911 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
is selected that uses a chipset which actually has that functionality _and_
we have code to initialize the Debug Port in coreboot (for that chipset).
Also, remove the duplicate list of PCI IDs and just link to the wiki page at:
http://www.coreboot.org/EHCI_Debug_Port
The list is now less useful in the kconfig help as this option will only
appear for those boards where it's actually supported.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5848 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
Signed-off-by: Juhana Helovuo <juhe@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5805 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
* SATA initialization.
* USB initialization.
* HDA initialization.
* LPC initialization.
* IDE initialization.
* SMBUS initialization.
Note:
1. I tried to add the description of every step to the code. For example,
if it is made based on rpr, section 2.4.5, I will pasted the words
from 2.4.5 to the c code. But the document I worked with might be
different with the most updated one. A new section has been added and
the 2.4.5 might be changed to 2.5.5. That migh lead to confusing. I
correct every comment if I met one. But I have to confess that I am so
reluctant to find out everyone. I believe it will be correct in the long
run.
2. I only test the SATA port 0-3. The ports 4, 5 are "PATA emulations".
I am confused about it.
3. This patch is not only about SB700. Actually it should be
SB7x0. But I dont think it is nice to change everything to
SB7x0. It is ugly, isn't it. As far as I know, they all use the
same code with revision checking. If you guys think it is
appropriate, please modify it to sb7x0.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5218 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
