| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I91158452680586ac676ea11c8589062880a31f91
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31692
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
PCI config accessors are no longer indirectly included
from <arch/io.h> use <device/pci_ops.h> instead.
Change-Id: I2adf46430a33bc52ef69d1bf7dca4655fc8475bd
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31675
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
These are defined for __SIMPLE_DEVICE__ when PCI
enumeration has not happened yet. These should not
really try to probe devices other than those on bus 0.
It's hard to track but there maybe cases of southbridge
being located on bus 2 and available for configuration, so
I rather leave the code unchanged. Just move these out of
arch/io.h because they cause build failures if one attempts
to include <arch/pci_ops.h> before <arch/io.h>.
There are two direct copies for ROMCC bootblocks to
avoid inlining them elsewhere.
Change-Id: Ida2919a5d83fe5ea89284ffbd8ead382e4312524
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31304
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
And here comes the mess...
This just renames do_hard_reset() to do_board_reset() and keeps current
behaviour. As these are never called from chipset or board code but only
from common code, it's likely that their implementations are untested
and not what we actually want. Also note, that sometimes implementations
for rom- and ramstage differ considerably.
Change-Id: Icdf55ed1a0e0294933f61749a37da2ced01da61c
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29058
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
There are many good reasons why we may want to run some sort of generic
callback before we're executing a reset. Unfortunateley, that is really
hard right now: code that wants to reset simply calls the hard_reset()
function (or one of its ill-differentiated cousins) which is directly
implemented by a myriad of different mainboards, northbridges, SoCs,
etc. More recent x86 SoCs have tried to solve the problem in their own
little corner of soc/intel/common, but it's really something that would
benefit all of coreboot.
This patch expands the concept onto all boards: hard_reset() and friends
get implemented in a generic location where they can run hooks before
calling the platform-specific implementation that is now called
do_hard_reset(). The existing Intel reset_prepare() gets generalized as
soc_reset_prepare() (and other hooks for arch, mainboard, etc. can now
easily be added later if necessary). We will also use this central point
to ensure all platforms flush their cache before reset, which is
generally useful for all cases where we're trying to persist information
in RAM across reboots (like the new persistent CBMEM console does).
Also remove cpu_reset() completely since it's not used anywhere and
doesn't seem very useful compared to the others.
Change-Id: I41b89ce4a923102f0748922496e1dd9bce8a610f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19789
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
The code originates from times before __SIMPLE_DEVICE__ was
introduced. To keep behaviour unchanged, use explicit PCI
IO operations here.
Change-Id: I44851633115f9aee4c308fd3711571a4b14c5f2f
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17720
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Icfc35b73bacb60b1f21e71e70ad4418ec3e644f6
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16291
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I1a1412a1ee4125dcf1f01dc1f2ec6fd43b5d3c1f
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7196
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
the prefix was introduced in the early v2 tree many years ago
because our old build system "newconfig" could not handle two files with
the same name in different paths like /path/to/usb.c and
/another/path/to/usb.c correctly. Only one of the files would end up
being compiled into the final image.
Since Kconfig (actually since shortly before we switched to Kconfig) we
don't suffer from that problem anymore. So we could drop the sb700_
prefix from all those filenames (or, the <componentname>_ prefix in general)
- makes it easier to fork off a new chipset
- makes it easier to diff against other chipsets
- storing redundant information in filenames seems wrong
Signed-off-by: <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6149 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
