| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add RAM region so that the payload can be placed in there without
coreboot complaining that the payload doesn't target a RAM region.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Brune <maximilian.brune@9elements.com>
Change-Id: Id07eae3560ce69cd8a6a695702fa0b4463c50855
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81909
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Macros can be confusing on their own; hiding commas make things worse.
This can sometimes be downright misleading. A "good" example would be
the code in soc/intel/xeon_sp/spr/chip.c:
CHIP_NAME("Intel SapphireRapids-SP").enable_dev = chip_enable_dev,
This appears as CHIP_NAME() being some struct when in fact these are
defining 2 separate members of the same struct.
It was decided to remove this macro altogether, as it does not do
anything special and incurs a maintenance burden.
Change-Id: Iaed6dfb144bddcf5c43634b0c955c19afce388f0
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Sudsgaard <devel+coreboot@nsudsgaard.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80239
Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If06695745bb72f883314e5514c616223b0210a2f
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41716
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx>
|
