| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I25b9bbe320be891985e5fb42a0c3f1c763a833db
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40136
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
MMIO operations are arch-agnostic so the include
path should not be arch/.
Change-Id: I0fd70f5aeca02e98e96b980c3aca0819f5c44b98
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31691
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to src/:
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writel(V, A)
+ write32(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writew(V, A)
+ write16(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writeb(V, A)
+ write8(A, V)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readl(A)
+ read32(A)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readb(A)
+ read8(A)
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:444723
TEST=None (depends on next patch)
Change-Id: I5dd96490c85ee2bcbc669f08bc6fff0ecc0f9e27
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 64f643da95d85954c4d4ea91c34a5c69b9b08eb6
Original-Change-Id: I366a2eb5b3a0df2279ebcce572fe814894791c42
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254864
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9836
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
We have known for a while that the old x86 model of calling init_timer()
in ramstage doesn't make sense on other archs (and is questionable in
general), and finally removed it with CL:219719. However, now timer
initialization is completely buried in the platform code, and it's hard
to ensure it is done in time to set up timestamps. For three out of four
non-x86 SoC vendors we have brought up for now, the timers need some
kind of SoC-specific initialization.
This patch reintroduces init_timer() as a weak function that can be
overridden by platform code. The call in ramstage is restricted to x86
(and should probably eventually be removed from there as well), and
other archs should call them at the earliest reasonable point in their
bootblock. (Only changing arm for now since arm64 and mips bootblocks
are still in very early state and should sync up to features in arm once
their requirements are better understood.) This allows us to move
timestamp_init() into arch code, so that we can rely on timestamps
being available at a well-defined point and initialize our base value as
early as possible. (Platforms who know that their timers start at zero
can still safely call timestamp_init(0) again from platform code.)
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, Blaze and Storm, compiled Daisy and Pit.
Change-Id: I1b064ba3831c0c5b7965b1d88a6f4a590789c891
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ffaebcd3785c4ce998ac1536e9fdd46ce3f52bfa
Original-Change-Id: Iece1614b7442d4fa9ca981010e1c8497bdea308d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/234062
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9606
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some boards spread their timer implementation out in multiple files with
one function each for no discernable reason. Let's clean that up to make
things a little simpler to find.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, compiled Daisy and Pit.
Change-Id: I8b543d1a0d9af37bde5433b0c9271d687b2404b2
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 887765e1bd88d7aa49ad9a5e98b8831c10da6c10
Original-Change-Id: I43d29cd1b4a1d89cfd40f6cba5ca99ada3b00f82
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/234061
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9601
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add GENERIC_UDELAY Kconfig option so that a generic
udelay() implementation is provided utilizing the
monotonic timer. That way each board/chipset doesn't
need to duplicate the same udelay(). Additionally,
assume that GENERIC_UDELAY implies init_timer()
is not required.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built nyan, ryu, and rambi. May need help testing.
Change-Id: I7f511a2324b5aa5d1b2959f4519be85a6a7360e8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1a85fbcad778933d13eaef545135abe7e4de46ed
Original-Change-Id: Idd26de19eefc91ee3b0ceddfb1bc2152e19fd8ab
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219719
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9334
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This patch aligns exynos5420 to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Peach_Pit.
Change-Id: If97b40101d3541a81bca302a9bd64b84a04ff24a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 570ca9ed6337d622781f37184b2cd7209de0083f
Original-Change-Id: I338559564e57bdc5202d34c7173ce0d075ad2afc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224501
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
