| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The SPI drivers for tegra and exynos5420 have code in them which waits for a
frame header and leaves filler data out. The SPI driver shouldn't have support
for frame headers directly. If a device uses them, it should support them
itself. That makes the SPI drivers simpler and easier to write.
When moving the frame handling logic into the EC support code, EC communication
continued to work on tegra but no longer worked on exynos5420. That suggested
the SPI driver on the 5420 wasn't working correctly, so I replaced that with
the implementation in depthcharge. Unfortunately that implementation doesn't
support waiting for a frame header for the EC, so these changes are combined
into one.
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on pit. Built and booted on nyan. In both cases,
verified that there were no error messages from the SPI drivers or the EC
code.
BRANCH=None
Original-Change-Id: I62a68820c632f154acece94f54276ddcd1442c09
Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/191192
Original-Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4fcfed280ad70f14a013d5353aa0bee0af540630)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Id8824523abc7afcbc214845901628833e135d142
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7706
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch adds a new static assertion macro that can be used to check
the offsets in structures that overlay register sets at compile time. It
uses the _Static_assert() declaration from the new ISO C11 standard,
which is supported (even without -std=c11) by GCC after version 4.6.
(There is supposedly also support in clang, although I haven't tried
it... let's deal with compiler issues when/if they turn up.)
I've added it to all structures for our current ARM SoCs for now, and I
think every new register overlay we add going forward should use them
(at least for the last member, but feel free to add more if you think
it's useful).
Change-Id: If32510e7049739ad05618d363a854dc372d64386
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179412
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit cef5fa13c31375a316ca4556c0039b17c8ea7900)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6905
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
