Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: I21680354f33916b7b4d913f51a842b5d6c2ecef3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27408
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The word 'coreboot' should always be written in lowercase, even at the
start of a sentence.
Change-Id: I7945ddb988262e7483da4e623cedf972380e65a2
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20029
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7f0d3400126d593bad8e78f95e6b9a378463b4ce
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15963
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Used command line to remove empty lines at end of file:
find . -type f -exec sed -i -e :a -e '/^\n*$/{$d;N;};/\n$/ba' {} \;
Change-Id: I816ac9666b6dbb7c7e47843672f0d5cc499766a3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10446
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to src/:
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writel(V, A)
+ write32(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writew(V, A)
+ write16(A, V)
@@
expression A, V;
@@
- writeb(V, A)
+ write8(A, V)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readl(A)
+ read32(A)
@@
expression A;
@@
- readb(A)
+ read8(A)
BRANCH=none
BUG=chromium:444723
TEST=None (depends on next patch)
Change-Id: I5dd96490c85ee2bcbc669f08bc6fff0ecc0f9e27
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 64f643da95d85954c4d4ea91c34a5c69b9b08eb6
Original-Change-Id: I366a2eb5b3a0df2279ebcce572fe814894791c42
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254864
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9836
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch aligns exynos5420 to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Peach_Pit.
Change-Id: If97b40101d3541a81bca302a9bd64b84a04ff24a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 570ca9ed6337d622781f37184b2cd7209de0083f
Original-Change-Id: I338559564e57bdc5202d34c7173ce0d075ad2afc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224501
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I966645c83ae78943a7dbb9dc05af4fded6f4e5b5
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7703
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|