| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch aligns exynos5420 to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Peach_Pit.
Change-Id: If97b40101d3541a81bca302a9bd64b84a04ff24a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 570ca9ed6337d622781f37184b2cd7209de0083f
Original-Change-Id: I338559564e57bdc5202d34c7173ce0d075ad2afc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224501
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds the macros __ROMSTAGE__ and __RAMSTAGE__ which get
predefined in their respective stages by make, so that we have one
specific macro for every stage. It also renames __BOOT_BLOCK__ and
__VER_STAGE__ to __BOOTBLOCK__ and __VERSTAGE__ for consistency.
This change is intended to provide finer control and clearer
communication of intent after we added a new (optional) stage that falls
under __PRE_RAM__, and will hopefully provide some robustness for the
future (we don't want to end up always checking for romstage with #if
defined(__PRE_RAM__) && !defined(__BOOT_BLOCK__) &&
!defined(__VER_STAGE__) && !defined(__YET_ANOTHER_PRERAM_STAGE__)). The
__PRE_RAM__ macro stays as it is since many features do in fact need to
differentiate on whether RAM is available. (Some also depend on whether
RAM is available at the end of a stage, in which case #if
!defined(__PRE_RAM__) || defined(__ROMSTAGE__) should now be
authoritative.)
It's unfeasable to change all existing occurences of __PRE_RAM__ that
would be better described with __ROMSTAGE__, so this patch only
demonstratively changes a few obvious ones in core code.
BUG=None
TEST=None (tested together with dependent patch).
Change-Id: I6a06d0f42c27a2feeb778a4acd35dd14bb53f744
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: a4ad042746c1d3a7a3bfda422d26e0d3b9f9ae42
Original-Change-Id: I6a1f25f7077328a8b5201a79b18fc4c2e22d0b06
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219172
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9304
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Drop the inner underscore for consistency. Follows the
commit stated below.
Change-Id: I75cde6e2cd55d2c0fbb5a2d125c359d91e14cf6d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Based-on-Change-Id: I6a1f25f7077328a8b5201a79b18fc4c2e22d0b06
Based-on-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Based-on-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219172
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9290
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
