| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This change defines a Kconfig variable MEMLAYOUT_LD_FILE which allows
SoC/mainboard to provide a linker file for the platform. x86 already
provides a default memlayout.ld under src/arch/x86. With this new
Kconfig variable, it is possible for the SoC/mainboard code for x86 to
provide a custom linker file as well.
Makefile.inc is updated for all architectures to use this new Kconfig
variable instead of assuming memlayout.ld files under a certain
path. All non-x86 boards used memlayout.ld under mainboard
directory. However, a lot of these boards were simply including the
memlayout from SoC. So, this change also updates these mainboards and
SoCs to define the Kconfig as required.
BUG=b:155322763
TEST=Verified that abuild with --timeless option results in the same
coreboot.rom image for all boards.
Change-Id: I6a7f96643ed0519c93967ea2c3bcd881a5d6a4d6
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42292
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Also remove allwinner/a10 dummy monotonic_timer
implementation.
Change-Id: I9dfa9b92dc63375465e3bb87b73eeefad601c810
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34112
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Add a new Kconfig NO_BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE to disable the BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE
option completely. The commit message of fbb11cf (ARM: Separate the
early console (romstage) from the bootblock console.) states that it
doesn't work before romstage on Exynos 5420.
Change-Id: I9b56a52f2555b5233300f27031a9ef50e7ab7cea
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30926
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Some Chrome OS boards previously didn't have a hardcoded vboot
configuration (e.g. STARTS_IN_BOOTBLOCK/_ROMSTAGE, SEPARATE_VERSTAGE,
etc.) selected from their SoC and mainboard Kconfig files, and instead
relied on the Chrome OS build system to pass in those options
separately. Since there is usually only one "best" vboot configuration
for a certain board and there is often board or SoC code specifically
written with that configuration in mind (e.g. memlayout), these options
should not be adjustable in menuconfig and instead always get selected
by board and SoC Makefiles (as opposed to some external build system).
(Removing MAINBOARD_HAS_CHROMEOS from Urara because vboot support for
Pistachio/MIPS was never finished. Trying to enable even post-romstage
vboot leads to weird compiler errors that I don't want to track down
now. Let's stop pretending this board has working Chrome OS support
because it never did.)
Change-Id: Ibddf413568630f2e5d6e286b9eca6378d7170104
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19022
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
CPU_HAS_BOOTBLOCK_INIT is only declared once and selected elsewhere
(with no overlap), and never read. Remove it.
Change-Id: I3f294b0724a87876a7e2f274e6933fe10321a69d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10253
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add GENERIC_UDELAY Kconfig option so that a generic
udelay() implementation is provided utilizing the
monotonic timer. That way each board/chipset doesn't
need to duplicate the same udelay(). Additionally,
assume that GENERIC_UDELAY implies init_timer()
is not required.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built nyan, ryu, and rambi. May need help testing.
Change-Id: I7f511a2324b5aa5d1b2959f4519be85a6a7360e8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1a85fbcad778933d13eaef545135abe7e4de46ed
Original-Change-Id: Idd26de19eefc91ee3b0ceddfb1bc2152e19fd8ab
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219719
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9334
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
Drop the implementation of statically allocated high memory
region for CBMEM. There is no longer the need to explicitly
select DYNAMIC_CBMEM, it is the only remaining choice.
Change-Id: Iadf6f27a134e05daa1038646d0b4e0b8f9f0587a
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7851
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
This reverts the revert commit 5780d6f3876723b94fbe3653c9d87dad6330862e
and fixes the build issue that cuased it to be reverted.
Verstage will host vboot2 for firmware verification.
It's a stage in the sense that it has its own set of toolchains,
compiler flags,
and includes. This allows us to easily add object files as needed. But
it's directly linked to bootblock. This allows us to avoid code
duplication for stage loading and jumping (e.g. cbfs driver) for the
boards
where bootblock has to run in a different architecture (e.g. Tegra124).
To avoid name space conflict, verstage symbols are prefixed with
verstage_.
TEST=Built with VBOOT2_VERIFY_FIRMWARE on/off. Booted Nyan Blaze.
BUG=None
BRANCH=none
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: Iad57741157ec70426c676e46c5855e6797ac1dac
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/204376
Original-Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 27940f891678dae975b68f2fc729ad7348192af3)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I2a83b87c29d98d97ae316091cf3ed7b024e21daf
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8224
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Install the BL1 and set up the checksum in the Makefile instead of relying on
post processing. Import the exynos checksum script, split it in two and
simplify it significantly. Stop putting the CBFS header in the midst of the
bootblock so that it can be checksummed before CBFS is put together. Stop
saving space for it and leaving an anchor in the bootblock which nobody looks
for.
Change-Id: Icbb5a5914ece60b2827433b6dc29d80db996ea6c
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179229
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit aa3a416705517c0a6ddfdeb19905ac8cafb33df1)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
