summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/samsung/exynos5420/Kconfig
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-02-18soc: Add SPDX license headers to Kconfig filesMartin Roth
Change-Id: Ie7bc4f3ae00bb9601001dbb71e7c3c84fd4f759a Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80596 Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com> Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-06-13treewide: Add Kconfig variable MEMLAYOUT_LD_FILEFurquan Shaikh
This change defines a Kconfig variable MEMLAYOUT_LD_FILE which allows SoC/mainboard to provide a linker file for the platform. x86 already provides a default memlayout.ld under src/arch/x86. With this new Kconfig variable, it is possible for the SoC/mainboard code for x86 to provide a custom linker file as well. Makefile.inc is updated for all architectures to use this new Kconfig variable instead of assuming memlayout.ld files under a certain path. All non-x86 boards used memlayout.ld under mainboard directory. However, a lot of these boards were simply including the memlayout from SoC. So, this change also updates these mainboards and SoCs to define the Kconfig as required. BUG=b:155322763 TEST=Verified that abuild with --timeless option results in the same coreboot.rom image for all boards. Change-Id: I6a7f96643ed0519c93967ea2c3bcd881a5d6a4d6 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42292 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-07-09arch/non-x86: Flip HAVE_MONOTONIC_TIMER defaultKyösti Mälkki
Also remove allwinner/a10 dummy monotonic_timer implementation. Change-Id: I9dfa9b92dc63375465e3bb87b73eeefad601c810 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34112 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
2019-01-16soc/samsung/exynos5420: Disable BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLENico Huber
Add a new Kconfig NO_BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE to disable the BOOTBLOCK_CONSOLE option completely. The commit message of fbb11cf (ARM: Separate the early console (romstage) from the bootblock console.) states that it doesn't work before romstage on Exynos 5420. Change-Id: I9b56a52f2555b5233300f27031a9ef50e7ab7cea Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30926 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2017-03-28vboot: Select SoC-specific configuration for all Chrome OS boardsJulius Werner
Some Chrome OS boards previously didn't have a hardcoded vboot configuration (e.g. STARTS_IN_BOOTBLOCK/_ROMSTAGE, SEPARATE_VERSTAGE, etc.) selected from their SoC and mainboard Kconfig files, and instead relied on the Chrome OS build system to pass in those options separately. Since there is usually only one "best" vboot configuration for a certain board and there is often board or SoC code specifically written with that configuration in mind (e.g. memlayout), these options should not be adjustable in menuconfig and instead always get selected by board and SoC Makefiles (as opposed to some external build system). (Removing MAINBOARD_HAS_CHROMEOS from Urara because vboot support for Pistachio/MIPS was never finished. Trying to enable even post-romstage vboot leads to weird compiler errors that I don't want to track down now. Let's stop pretending this board has working Chrome OS support because it never did.) Change-Id: Ibddf413568630f2e5d6e286b9eca6378d7170104 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19022 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-05-19Remove Kconfig variable that has no effectPatrick Georgi
CPU_HAS_BOOTBLOCK_INIT is only declared once and selected elsewhere (with no overlap), and never read. Remove it. Change-Id: I3f294b0724a87876a7e2f274e6933fe10321a69d Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10253 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-04-14CBFS: Automate ROM image layout and remove hardcoded offsetsJulius Werner
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image layout a completely automated part of cbfstool. Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86 solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures. This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM). Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name) argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco. Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-04-08timer: Add generic udelay() implementationAaron Durbin
Add GENERIC_UDELAY Kconfig option so that a generic udelay() implementation is provided utilizing the monotonic timer. That way each board/chipset doesn't need to duplicate the same udelay(). Additionally, assume that GENERIC_UDELAY implies init_timer() is not required. BUG=None BRANCH=None TEST=Built nyan, ryu, and rambi. May need help testing. Change-Id: I7f511a2324b5aa5d1b2959f4519be85a6a7360e8 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 1a85fbcad778933d13eaef545135abe7e4de46ed Original-Change-Id: Idd26de19eefc91ee3b0ceddfb1bc2152e19fd8ab Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219719 Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9334 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-04-06New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic bounds checkingJulius Werner
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout (primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation cannot go missing or out of date. The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include). BUG=None TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies with ToT and looked for red flags. Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614 Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2015-01-27CBMEM: Always use DYNAMIC_CBMEMKyösti Mälkki
Drop the implementation of statically allocated high memory region for CBMEM. There is no longer the need to explicitly select DYNAMIC_CBMEM, it is the only remaining choice. Change-Id: Iadf6f27a134e05daa1038646d0b4e0b8f9f0587a Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7851 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2015-01-27vboot2: add verstageStefan Reinauer
This reverts the revert commit 5780d6f3876723b94fbe3653c9d87dad6330862e and fixes the build issue that cuased it to be reverted. Verstage will host vboot2 for firmware verification. It's a stage in the sense that it has its own set of toolchains, compiler flags, and includes. This allows us to easily add object files as needed. But it's directly linked to bootblock. This allows us to avoid code duplication for stage loading and jumping (e.g. cbfs driver) for the boards where bootblock has to run in a different architecture (e.g. Tegra124). To avoid name space conflict, verstage symbols are prefixed with verstage_. TEST=Built with VBOOT2_VERIFY_FIRMWARE on/off. Booted Nyan Blaze. BUG=None BRANCH=none Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Original-Change-Id: Iad57741157ec70426c676e46c5855e6797ac1dac Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/204376 Original-Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 27940f891678dae975b68f2fc729ad7348192af3) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: I2a83b87c29d98d97ae316091cf3ed7b024e21daf Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8224 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-09-09exynos: Install the BL1 and set the checksum in the Makefile.Gabe Black
Install the BL1 and set up the checksum in the Makefile instead of relying on post processing. Import the exynos checksum script, split it in two and simplify it significantly. Stop putting the CBFS header in the midst of the bootblock so that it can be checksummed before CBFS is put together. Stop saving space for it and leaving an anchor in the bootblock which nobody looks for. Change-Id: Icbb5a5914ece60b2827433b6dc29d80db996ea6c Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179229 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit aa3a416705517c0a6ddfdeb19905ac8cafb33df1) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6834 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-08-26armv7: Move Exynos from 'cpu' to 'soc'.Hung-Te Lin
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU. We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot. Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891 Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>