| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There were instances of unneeded arch/hlt.h includes,
various hlt() calls that weren't supposed to exit (but
might have) and various forms of endless loops around
hlt() calls.
All these are sorted out now: unnecessary includes are
dropped, hlt() is uniformly replaced with halt() (except
in assembly, obviously).
Change-Id: I3d38fed6e8d67a28fdeb17be803d8c4b62d383c5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7608
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Change-Id: Iaf2b2873bd1c52d7f936bd9b483e194a0872a626
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7285
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Bruce Griffith <Bruce.Griffith@se-eng.com>
|
|
We had lots of casts that caused warnings when compiling on RISCV.
Clean them up.
Change-Id: I46fcb33147ad6bf75e49ebfdfa05990e8c7ae4eb
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7066
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds a new static assertion macro that can be used to check
the offsets in structures that overlay register sets at compile time. It
uses the _Static_assert() declaration from the new ISO C11 standard,
which is supported (even without -std=c11) by GCC after version 4.6.
(There is supposedly also support in clang, although I haven't tried
it... let's deal with compiler issues when/if they turn up.)
I've added it to all structures for our current ARM SoCs for now, and I
think every new register overlay we add going forward should use them
(at least for the last member, but feel free to add more if you think
it's useful).
Change-Id: If32510e7049739ad05618d363a854dc372d64386
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179412
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit cef5fa13c31375a316ca4556c0039b17c8ea7900)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6905
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Showed up as an error when '--gc-sections' was added as a flag to the
compiler.
Change-Id: I214d3e16a72fca0becc677d7af66097464d64247
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6926
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
Patch 12b121f3fef61d introduced an off-by-one error in the offsets of the
PMU register struct, which put both the newly added register and the
PSHOLD that comes after it in the wrong place. This patch corrects the
offsets (5420 had already been correct).
Change-Id: I1d9d31a6a73ee91890824e94fbd247d5feb4f6ae
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179411
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5fdc74bc18bcb1066a0ce3ba94829af1b175173b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6892
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Install the BL1 and set up the checksum in the Makefile instead of relying on
post processing. Import the exynos checksum script, split it in two and
simplify it significantly. Stop putting the CBFS header in the midst of the
bootblock so that it can be checksummed before CBFS is put together. Stop
saving space for it and leaving an anchor in the bootblock which nobody looks
for.
Change-Id: Icbb5a5914ece60b2827433b6dc29d80db996ea6c
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/179229
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit aa3a416705517c0a6ddfdeb19905ac8cafb33df1)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6834
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The exynos directories had been moved from src/cpu to src/soc, but the name
of the chip_operations structure wasn't updated properly. That meant that the
SOCs never installed their memory resources and the ram stage would fail to
load the payload.
Change-Id: Ib60489b6d3434e3ebd13827a804452f762747f1b
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/172400
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9100d475ebcc4dae23184583a6cc0162577e70d1)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6781
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
This minor refactoring patch changes the signature of all limited cache
invalidation functions in coreboot and libpayload from unsigned long to
void * for the address argument, since that's really what you have in
95% of the cases and I think it's ugly to have casting boilerplate all
over the place.
Change-Id: Ic9d3b2ea70b6aa8aea6647adae43ee2183b4e065
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167338
(cherry picked from commit d550bec944736dfa29fcf109e30f17a94af03576)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6623
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
