summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/samsung/exynos5250/bootblock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-12-30ipq/arm: Redesign hooks for bootblockVadim Bendebury
The following patches had to be squashed to properly build all the different ARM boards. ipq8064: storm: re-arrange bootblock initialization The recent addition of the storm bootblock initialization broke compilation of Exynos platforms. The SOC specific code needs to be kept in the respective source files, not in the common CPU code. As of now coreboot does not provide a separate SOC initialization API. In general it makes sense to invoke SOC initialization from the board initialization code, as the board knows what SOC it is running on. Presently all what's need initialization on 8064 is the timer. This patch adds the SOC initialization framework for 8064 and moves there the related code. BUG=chrome-os-partner:27784 TEST=manual . nyan_big, peach_pit, and storm targets build fine now. Original-Change-Id: Iae9a021f8cbf7d009770b02d798147a3e08420e8 Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197835 (cherry picked from commit 3ea7307b531b1a78c692e4f71a0d81b32108ebf0) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> arm: Redesign mainboard and SoC hooks for bootblock This patch makes some slight changes to the way bootblock_cpu_init() and bootblock_mainboard_init() are used on ARM. Experience has shown that nearly every board needs either one or both of these hooks, so having explicit Kconfigs for them has become unwieldy. Instead, this patch implements them as a weak symbol that can be overridden by mainboard/SoC code, as the more recent arm64_soc_init() is also doing. Since the whole concept of a single "CPU" on ARM systems has kinda died out, rename bootblock_cpu_init() to bootblock_soc_init(). (This had already been done on Storm/ipq806x, which is now adjusted to directly use the generic hook.) Also add a proper license header to bootblock_common.h that was somehow missing. Leaving non-ARM32 architectures out for now, since they are still using the really old and weird x86 model of directly including a file. These architectures should also eventually be aligned with the cleaner ARM32 model as they mature. BRANCH=None BUG=chrome-os-partner:32123 TEST=Booted on Pinky. Compiled for Storm and confirmed in the disassembly that bootblock_soc_init() is still compiled in and called right before the (now no-op) bootblock_mainboard_init(). Original-Change-Id: I57013b99c3af455cc3d7e78f344888d27ffb8d79 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231940 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 257aaee9e3aeeffe50ed54de7342dd2bc9baae76) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Id055fe60a8caf63a9787138811dc69ac04dfba57 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7879 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-08-26armv7: Move Exynos from 'cpu' to 'soc'.Hung-Te Lin
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU. We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot. Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891 Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>