| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch aligns exynos5250 to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Daisy.
Change-Id: I39805c0346e117a0f9b2667763ecaa428f0f55a8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: db6762f0c8425371d9860f908a5cefdeee8d1abc
Original-Change-Id: Ic358061ddcbbe7d83a95ca11247b8b505b20491d
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224500
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9323
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
This patch adds the macros __ROMSTAGE__ and __RAMSTAGE__ which get
predefined in their respective stages by make, so that we have one
specific macro for every stage. It also renames __BOOT_BLOCK__ and
__VER_STAGE__ to __BOOTBLOCK__ and __VERSTAGE__ for consistency.
This change is intended to provide finer control and clearer
communication of intent after we added a new (optional) stage that falls
under __PRE_RAM__, and will hopefully provide some robustness for the
future (we don't want to end up always checking for romstage with #if
defined(__PRE_RAM__) && !defined(__BOOT_BLOCK__) &&
!defined(__VER_STAGE__) && !defined(__YET_ANOTHER_PRERAM_STAGE__)). The
__PRE_RAM__ macro stays as it is since many features do in fact need to
differentiate on whether RAM is available. (Some also depend on whether
RAM is available at the end of a stage, in which case #if
!defined(__PRE_RAM__) || defined(__ROMSTAGE__) should now be
authoritative.)
It's unfeasable to change all existing occurences of __PRE_RAM__ that
would be better described with __ROMSTAGE__, so this patch only
demonstratively changes a few obvious ones in core code.
BUG=None
TEST=None (tested together with dependent patch).
Change-Id: I6a06d0f42c27a2feeb778a4acd35dd14bb53f744
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: a4ad042746c1d3a7a3bfda422d26e0d3b9f9ae42
Original-Change-Id: I6a1f25f7077328a8b5201a79b18fc4c2e22d0b06
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219172
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9304
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
