Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Since, SMP support is removed for ARM64, there is no need for CPU
initialization to be performed via device-tree.
Change-Id: I0534e6a93c7dc8659859eac926d17432d10243aa
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11913
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
As ARM Trusted Firmware is the only first class citizen for
booting arm64 multi-processor in coreboot remove SMP
support. If SoCs want to bring up MP then ATF needs to be
ported and integrated.
Change-Id: Ife24d53eed9b7a5a5d8c69a64d7a20a55a4163db
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
As ARM Trusted Firmware is the only first class citizen for
booting arm64 multi-processor in coreboot remove spintable
support. If SoCs want to bring up MP then ATF needs to be
ported and integrated.
Change-Id: I1f38b8d8b0952eee50cc64440bfd010b1dd0bff4
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11908
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Some of the Chrome OS boards were directly calling vboot
called in some form after contorting around #ifdef preprocessor
macros. The reasoning is that Chrome OS doesn't always do display
initialization during startup. It's runtime dependent. While
this is a requirement that doesn't mean vboot functions should be
sprinkled around in the mainboard and chipset code. Instead provide
one function, display_init_required(), that provides the policy
for determining display initialization action. For Chrome OS
devices this function honors vboot_skip_display_init() and all
other configurations default to initializing display.
Change-Id: I403213e22c0e621e148773597a550addfbaf3f7e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11490
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
The NV security team requested that coreboot allocate a 128MB
region in SDRAM for VPR (Video Protection Region). We had
previously just disabled the VPR by setting BOM/SIZE to 0.
Once allocated, the VPR will be locked from further access.
The ALLOW_TZ_WRITE_ACCESS bit is _not_ set, as dynamic VPR config
is not supported at this time (i.e. trusted code can _not_ remap
or resize the VPR).
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on my P5 A44. Saw the VPR region in the
boot spew (ID:3 [f6800000 - fe800000]). Dumped the MC VideoProtect
registers and verified their values.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Original-Commit-Id: a7481dba31dc39f482f8a7bfdaba1d1f4fc3cb81
Original-Change-Id: Ia19af485430bc09dbba28fcef5de16de851f81aa
Original-Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/290475
Original-Reviewed-by: Hyung Taek Ryoo <hryoo@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Hridya Valsaraju <hvalsaraju@nvidia.com>
Original-(cherry picked from commit 9629b318eb17b145315531509f950da02483114f)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291095
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I19a93c915990644177c491c8212f2cf356d4d17d
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11384
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
New sdram_lp0_save_params() function for T210.
Due to its size, move the function from romstage to ramstage.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:40741
BRANCH=None
TEST=Build ok on Smaug; and check scratch registers
Change-Id: I420ac4c15262f2c6307bcd84beb6c5da0310c7c0
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 38860895938c40062a9f860f75e31a539f15992b
Original-Change-Id: Iaa478969458946faedd295578fe7d72b5a32e701
Original-Signed-off-by: Yen Lin <yelin@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/277022
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10952
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
1. Correct MTC weak function definitions.
2. Correct MTC message in case no training data is present.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully and boots to kernel prompt on smaug.
Change-Id: Iba3c994982da947af3fbd2d7e9a06dff7947f2b9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ce9a4cd7d824acd0da5615b33319869f6cf1cd56
Original-Change-Id: I037439246709c8ec0ec7f12ea109cbe0ae1073ae
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/278027
Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10780
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c.
Change-Id: I81853434600390d643160fe57554495b2bfe60ab
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|