| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It turns out that tegra132 and tegra 210 need the framebuffer's
bytes-per-line to be aligned to 64 for proper display. This behaviour
was default before moving to edid_set_framebuffer_bits_per_pixel.
Change-Id: I46dadcf36e1c50e9649121ee6fa9cdf6134a531e
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14734
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This renames "becasue" occurrences to "because".
Change-Id: I7862ce6a865cb1525ca1cef69c2eb1e90cc76a9d
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14735
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Our EDID code had always been aligning the framebuffer's
bytes_per_line (and x_resolution dependent on that) to 64. It turns out
that this is a controller-dependent parameter that seems to only really
be necessary for Intel chipsets, and commit 6911219cc (edid: Add helper
function to calculate bits-per-pixel dependent values) probably actually
broke this for some other controllers by applying the alignment too
widely.
This patch makes it explicitly configurable and depends the default on
ARCH_X86 (which seems to be the simplest and least intrusive way to make
it fit most cases for now... boards where this doesn't apply can still
override it manually by calling edid_set_framebuffer_bits_per_pixel()
again).
Change-Id: I1c565a72826fc5ddfbb1ae4a5db5e9063b761455
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14267
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Coreboot and most payloads support three basic pixel widths for the
framebuffer. It assumes 32 by default, but several chipsets need to
override that value with whatever else they're supporting. Our struct
edid contains multiple convenience values that are directly derived from
this (and other properties), so changing the bits per pixel always
requires recalculating all those dependents in the chipset code. This
patch provides a small convenience wrapper that can be used to
consistently update the whole struct edid with a new pixel width
instead, so we no longer need to duplicate those calculations
everywhere.
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Oak in all three pixel widths (which it conveniently all
supports), confirmed that images looked good.
Change-Id: I5376dd4e28cf107ac2fba1dc418f5e1c5a2e2de6
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14158
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c.
Change-Id: I81853434600390d643160fe57554495b2bfe60ab
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
