Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Clean up redundant `struct pad_func` and `PAD_*` definitions. This patch
also refactors the PAD_* macros by,
- Repurposing PAD_FUNC and dropping PAD_FUNC_SEL.
- Adding PAD_FUNC_DOWN and PAD_FUNC_UP to avoid the implicit
initialization.
BUG=none
TEST=emerge-{elm, kukui, asurada, cherry, corsola, geralt, rauru} coreboot
Change-Id: I12b8f6749015bff52988208a7c3aa01e952612c6
Signed-off-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84222
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
<gpio.h> chain-include <soc/gpio.h>.
Change-Id: If2af7f77e2d910a3f3470d15dbfc98775a2633b6
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71813
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
|
|
This replaces 'SPDX-License-Identifier' tags in all the files under
soc/mediatek/mt8195 for better code re-use in other open source
software stack.
These files were originally from MediaTek and follow coreboot's main
license: "GPL-2.0-only". Now MediaTek replaces these files to
"GPL-2.0-only OR MIT" license.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I79a585c2a611dbfd294c1c94f998d972118b5c52
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66625
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic87e41a9b317cc7d0b36ece5ffd1d32068e6a33a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/60612
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
Move mtk_i2c_max_step_cnt, mtk_i2c_check_ac_timing, mtk_i2c_speed_init
and mtk_i2c_calculate_speed to common folder to share with MT8186.
TEST=test on tomato ok
TEST=emerge-asurada coreboot
BUG=b:202871018
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I4a702741c763bf9261cea90d0d71c08b6e28c261
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/59295
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
ltiming and clock_div are not support for MT8173, so we separate them
to weak function: mtk_i2c_dump_more_info()
Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: I3228c6953be5fac18a76029702b878a34c7563f7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58074
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
1. The original algorithm for I2C speed cannot always make the
timing meet I2C specification so a new algorithm is introduced
to calculate the timing parameters more correctly.
2. Some I2C buses should be initialized in a different speed while
the original implementation was fixed at fast mode (400Khz).
So the mtk_i2c_bus_init is now also taking an extra speed
parameter.
There is an equivalent change in kernel side:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c?h=v5.15-rc3&id=be5ce0e97cc7a5c0d2da45d617b7bc567c3d3fa1
BUG=b:189899864
TEST=Test on Tomato, boot pass and timing pass
at 100/300/400/500/800/1000Khz.
Signed-off-by: Daolong Zhu <jg_daolongzhu@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Id25b7bb3a76908a7943b940eb5bee799e80626a0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58053
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
TEST=write/read EEPROM on MT8195 EVB successfully
Change-Id: Ia26e55512501e9758d7f5543d176730cf30ce03d
Signed-off-by: kewei xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/53894
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|