| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch fix whitespace and formating issues:
1. Using two spaces between code and single line comment.
2. No space after asterisk.
3. Fix checkpatch error.
4. Remove spaces after cast operators.
BUG=b:80501386
BRANCH=none
TEST=the refactored code works fine on the new platform (with the rest
of the patches applied) and Elm platform
Change-Id: Ib36c99b141c94220776fab606eb36af8f64f65bb
Signed-off-by: Tristan Shieh <tristan.shieh@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26880
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
There are many good reasons why we may want to run some sort of generic
callback before we're executing a reset. Unfortunateley, that is really
hard right now: code that wants to reset simply calls the hard_reset()
function (or one of its ill-differentiated cousins) which is directly
implemented by a myriad of different mainboards, northbridges, SoCs,
etc. More recent x86 SoCs have tried to solve the problem in their own
little corner of soc/intel/common, but it's really something that would
benefit all of coreboot.
This patch expands the concept onto all boards: hard_reset() and friends
get implemented in a generic location where they can run hooks before
calling the platform-specific implementation that is now called
do_hard_reset(). The existing Intel reset_prepare() gets generalized as
soc_reset_prepare() (and other hooks for arch, mainboard, etc. can now
easily be added later if necessary). We will also use this central point
to ensure all platforms flush their cache before reset, which is
generally useful for all cases where we're trying to persist information
in RAM across reboots (like the new persistent CBMEM console does).
Also remove cpu_reset() completely since it's not used anywhere and
doesn't seem very useful compared to the others.
Change-Id: I41b89ce4a923102f0748922496e1dd9bce8a610f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19789
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
The MT8173 hardware watchdog can assert an external signal which we use
to reset the TPM on Oak. Therefore we do not need to do the same
double-reset dance as on other Chromebooks to ensure that we reset in a
correct state.
Still, we have a situation where we need to reconfigure the watchdog
early in the bootblock in a way that will clear information about the
previous reboot from the status register, and we need that information
later in ramstage to log the right event. Let's reuse the same watchdog
tombstone mechanism from other boards, except that we don't perform a
second reset and the tombstone is simply used to communicate between
bootblock and ramstage within the same boot.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Run 'mem w 0x10007004 0x8' on Oak, observe how it reboots and how
'mosys eventlog list' shows a hardware watchdog reboot event afterwards.
Change-Id: I1ade018eba652af91814fdaec233b9920f2df01f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 07af37e11499e86e730f7581862e8f0d67a04218
Original-Change-Id: I0b9c6b83b20d6e1362d650ac2ee49fff45b29767
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/334449
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14234
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
[pg: split original commit into multiple commits]
Change-Id: I0dc8d9855c98c077d4a47227de0c504c3a846953
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2827aa08ff8712c0245a22378f3ddb0ca054255d
Original-Change-Id: I94a9ee2c00e25a37a92133f813d0cd11a3503656
Original-Signed-off-by: Yidi Lin <yidi.lin@mediatek.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/292662
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13050
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
