| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The SoC code was never completed. It's just a skeleton that gets
in the way of refactoring other code. Likewise, the mainboard was
never completed either. Just remove them both.
Change-Id: I8faaa9bb1b90ad2936dcdbaf2882651ebba6630c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19823
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This patch attempts to finish the separation between CONFIG_VBOOT and
CONFIG_CHROMEOS by moving the remaining options and code (including
image generation code for things like FWID and GBB flags, which are
intrinsic to vboot itself) from src/vendorcode/google/chromeos to
src/vboot. Also taking this opportunity to namespace all VBOOT Kconfig
options, and clean up menuconfig visibility for them (i.e. some options
were visible even though they were tied to the hardware while others
were invisible even though it might make sense to change them).
CQ-DEPEND=CL:459088
Change-Id: I3e2e31150ebf5a96b6fe507ebeb53a41ecf88122
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18984
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE should be independent of CHROMEOS. This allows use
of verified boot library without having to stick to CHROMEOS.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:55639
Change-Id: Ia2c328712caedd230ab295b8a613e3c1ed1532d9
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15867
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
When we first added ARM support to coreboot, it was clear that the
bootblock would need to do vastly different tasks than on x86, so we
moved its main logic under arch/. Now that we have several more
architectures, it turns out (as with so many things lately) that x86 is
really the odd one out, and all the others are trying to do pretty much
the same thing. This has already caused maintenance issues as the ARM32
bootblock developed and less-mature architectures were left behind with
old cruft.
This patch tries to address that problem by centralizing that logic
under lib/ for use by all architectures/SoCs that don't explicitly
opt-out (with the slightly adapted existing BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM option).
This works great out of the box for ARM32 and ARM64. It could probably
be easily applied to MIPS and RISCV as well, but I don't have any of
those boards to test so I'll mark them as BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM for now and
leave that for later cleanup.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built Jerry and Falco, booted Oak.
Change-Id: Ibbf727ad93651e388aef20e76f03f5567f9860cb
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12076
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Add CHROMEOS dependencies to selects for the following Kconfig
symbols:
CHROMEOS_RAMOOPS_DYNAMIC
CHROMEOS_RAMOOPS_NON_ACPI
CHROMEOS_VBNV_CMOS
CHROMEOS_VBNV_EC
CHROMEOS_VBNV_FLASH
EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC
LID_SWITCH
RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE
SEPARATE_VERSTAGE
VBOOT_DISABLE_DEV_ON_RECOVERY
VBOOT_EC_SLOW_UPDATE
VBOOT_OPROM_MATTERS
VBOOT_STARTS_IN_BOOTBLOCK
WIPEOUT_SUPPORTED
This gets rid of these sorts of Kconfig errors:
warning: BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS selects CHROMEOS_VBNV_EC which has
unmet direct dependencies (MAINBOARD_HAS_CHROMEOS && CHROMEOS)
Note: These two boards would never actually have CHROMEOS enabled:
intel/emeraldlake2 has MAINBOARD_HAS_CHROMEOS commented out
google/peach_pit doesn't have MAINBOARD_HAS_CHROMEOS
Change-Id: I51b4ee326f082c6a656a813ee5772e9c34f5c343
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11272
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The EARLY_CONSOLE Kconfig symbol was removed in
commit 48713a1b - console: Drop EARLY_CONSOLE option
The arm64 and mips directories don't even have early_console.c
to include.
Change-Id: Idc60ffb2bac2b180f4fdd0adf5c411e1f692a846
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10615
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
DYNAMIC_CBMEM is only selected a couple of times but never declared
or read. Remove it.
Change-Id: I5016dac2c935d3f261001e9f388a8989540e93ae
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10255
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
CPU_HAS_BOOTBLOCK_INIT is only declared once and selected elsewhere
(with no overlap), and never read. Remove it.
Change-Id: I3f294b0724a87876a7e2f274e6933fe10321a69d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10253
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The ChromeOS machines employing vboot verfication require
different combinations of support:
1. When vboot verification starts.
2. Is the vboot code a separate stage or program?
3. If a separate stage, does the that vboot program (verstage) return
to the stage that loaded the verstage?
For the above, #1 is dependent on when to load/run vboot logic which
is orthogonal to #2. However, #3 is dependent on #2. The logic
to act on the combinations follows in subsequent patches.
Change-Id: I39ef7a7c2858e7de43aa99c38121e85a57f1f2f6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10024
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
There's no need to have the VBOOT2_VERIFY_FIRMWARE
distinction because it's the only game in town.
Change-Id: I82aab665934c27829e1a04115bf499ae527a91aa
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9958
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
If verified boot is enabled, merge verstage into bootblock. This also
requires custom bootblock code to actually call into verstage.
[pg: modified to match upstream]
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32631
BRANCH=ToT
TEST=booted on cosmos development board.
Change-Id: I53251aac966ee15da24232c23fefa636de8b253b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2b8ada263017b46afa755b5acb759574184dba06
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: Ia0e1236357aa32bf553fb8cc98f3a8d29de17f45
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229795
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10008
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
BOARD_ID functionality is not what requires the GPIO lib,
but it is the mainboard specific implementations that do.
The option essentially says whether the SoC provides
<soc/gpio.h> (with the interface required by the common
GPIO code). Right now, x86 and Samsung's Exynos SOCs
don't have support for this interface.
So this should be selected by the SOC, not by
BOARD_ID_SUPPORT.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=emerge-storm coreboot still successfully compiled an image
Change-Id: I0ce2bd7ce023f22791d31a6245833b61135504b3
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0dd4dea521372194eedf11b077d95fd3b15ad9f7
Original-Change-Id: I3dea6c2fb42a23fcb9d384c3bbfa7fc8e217be2d
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/262743
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9899
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
this sets the proper architecture for bg4cd's bcm, which is armv7-m.
BUG=none
TEST=built cosmos
BRANCH=none
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6af25080c10a245a1fc884acb2a705f0b5d96309
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fc04fd26f1f2634115fc9bcefd6eee5611c80659
Original-Change-Id: I3334c3ba27a3582ce0fe5b484a5a22c8441a4c11
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224773
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9381
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is a no-op aesthetic change, arranging configurarion and makefile
lines alphanumerically.
BRANCH=none
BUG=none
TEST=cosmos still builds
Change-Id: I72b7defca722380dda3ef8453e625f28bdebfa2c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: c55a7e9d5064edf5cac9498c8c6c377cbf705bb1
Original-Change-Id: I4498eef59fc20ea04b6ebadb451d0fe346824c05
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223597
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9353
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This adds board and soc files as a template for cosmos.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32772
BRANCH=none
TEST=Built coreboot for cosmos and veyron_pinky.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6e17058afaa629c6aa70c2d195230dba782af526
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fd9dbcf1023a79921c8501bbe09969d65ca9e742
Original-Change-Id: I676bdf460f5dd996dcce1fc422a69882798bc112
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/222050
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9351
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
