Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Unmentioned fields are initialized with 0 (or NULL) implicitly. Beside
that, the struct has grown over the years. There are too many optional
fields to list them all.
Change-Id: Icb9e14c58153d7c14817bcde148e86e977666e4b
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40126
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
These two identifiers were always very confusing. We're not filling and
injecting generators. We are filling SSDTs and injecting into the DSDT.
So drop the `_generator` suffix. Hopefully, this also makes ACPI look a
little less scary.
Change-Id: I6f0e79632c9c855f38fe24c0186388a25990c44d
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39977
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Refactor the code and split it into Xeon common and CPU-specific code.
Move most Skylake-SP code into skx/ and keep common code in the current
folder.
This is a preparation for future work that will enable next
generation server CPU.
TEST=Tested on OCP Tioga Pass. There does not seem to be degradation
of stability as far as I could tell.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Petrov <anpetrov@fb.com>
Change-Id: I448e6cfd6a85efb83d132ad26565557fe55a265a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39601
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch adds support for Intel Xeon-SP.
This patch is developed and verified with Skylake Scalable
Processor, which is a processor in Xeon-SP family. The code
is expected to be reusable for future geneations of Xeon-SP
processors, and will be updated with smaller targeted
patches accordingly, to add support for additional Xeon-SP
processors, to add features, and to improve the code base.
The Skylake-SP FSP is based on FSP 2.0. The FSP is a
proof-of-concept build. The binary is not shared in public,
when this patch is upstreamed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Reddy Chagam <anjaneya.chagam@intel.com>
Tested-by: johnny_lin@wiwynn.com
Change-Id: Idc9c3bee17caf8b4841f0bc190cb1aa9d38fc23e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38548
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|