| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Allow the use of the common/gpio driver to create Lewisburg PCH pad
configurations for server motherboards with Skylake-SP processors.
This patch should only be applied after adding Lewisburg PCH definitions
to the soc/intel/xeon_sp code [1].
[1] https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39425
Change-Id: I4a8e83cad0729bbbb50ba5a2b336f6cf7c1eca13
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39428
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds barebones support.
What works:
* Linux kernel boots fine
* SIRQ and PCH interupts work fine (only in IOAPIC mode)
* PCH devices are usable
What doesn't:
* MP init is not there yet, only 1 CPU is up
* SMM is not supported
* GPIO is not available
* All IIO and extended bus numbers enumeration is not yet available
* Warm reset flow is untested
* MRC cache save/load
TEST=boots into Linux
Signed-off-by: Andrey Petrov <anpetrov@fb.com>
Change-Id: I7c987badc3c53f16ad178369c7e0906d6596e465
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39713
Reviewed-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Refactor the code and split it into Xeon common and CPU-specific code.
Move most Skylake-SP code into skx/ and keep common code in the current
folder.
This is a preparation for future work that will enable next
generation server CPU.
TEST=Tested on OCP Tioga Pass. There does not seem to be degradation
of stability as far as I could tell.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Petrov <anpetrov@fb.com>
Change-Id: I448e6cfd6a85efb83d132ad26565557fe55a265a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39601
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
If we don't pretend to have binaries, there is no need to add fake ones.
This also fixes building the default config.
Change-Id: I8f933f24a734a9ce3d82ef57f7f234ee4dfa86e9
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39383
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds support for Intel Xeon-SP.
This patch is developed and verified with Skylake Scalable
Processor, which is a processor in Xeon-SP family. The code
is expected to be reusable for future geneations of Xeon-SP
processors, and will be updated with smaller targeted
patches accordingly, to add support for additional Xeon-SP
processors, to add features, and to improve the code base.
The Skylake-SP FSP is based on FSP 2.0. The FSP is a
proof-of-concept build. The binary is not shared in public,
when this patch is upstreamed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Reddy Chagam <anjaneya.chagam@intel.com>
Tested-by: johnny_lin@wiwynn.com
Change-Id: Idc9c3bee17caf8b4841f0bc190cb1aa9d38fc23e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38548
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
