Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: I7f0d3400126d593bad8e78f95e6b9a378463b4ce
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15963
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
There used to be a need for an empty smm_init() function
because initialize_cpus() called it even though nothing
called initialize_cpus(). However, garbage collection at
link time is implemented so there's no reason to provide an
empty function to satisfy a symbol that is completely culled
during link. Remove it.
Change-Id: Ic13c85f1d3d57e38e7132e4289a98a95829f765a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14605
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
In order to reduce duplication of code use the common MP and SMM
initialization flow.
Change-Id: I5c4674ed258922b6616d75f070df976ef9fad209
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14597
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
We use UNDERSCORE_CASE. For the MTRR macros that refer to an MSR,
we also remove the _MSR suffix, as they are, by definition, MSRs.
Change-Id: Id4483a75d62cf1b478a9105ee98a8f55140ce0ef
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11761
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
cbmem_top was using CHIPSET_RESERVED_MEM_BYTES to w/a unknown memory
regions reserved by fsp for chipset use. With that being removed, the
function needs to properly walk though the memory map resulted from fsp
memory init to find out the usable address for cbmem root.
Refer the FSP 1.3.0 Integartion guide for more details on the Memory
Map.
systemagent should also use the same mechanism to create the reserved
RAM resource.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Build and Boot kunimitsu (FAB3)
CQ-DEPEND=CL:*226035,CL:*226045,CL:291573
Original-Change-Id: Id0954cf8e6388e549c7d4df67b468572b5bea539
Original-Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291611
Original-Tested-by: Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Robbie Zhang <robbie.zhang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4e716170f40936081ce9d4878bf74c75f469f78d
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11239
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The smm_subregion() support allows the SMM relocation
to not use duplicated math by calling out the specific
regions it wants. IED base is now correct and not
pointing outside from SMRAM.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43636
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built, booted, suspended, resumed on glados.
Original-Change-Id: Ief8940c2ab6320449500ced2121d0cd7ed73af4b
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/290930
Original-Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Trybot-Ready: David James <davidjames@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I00c3284cfacb2a73942640ccfa7912b7d65efb9d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11198
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Add the files to support the Skylake SOC.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on a Skylake platform
Change-Id: I80248f7e47eaf13b52e3c7ff951eb1976edbaa15
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the Broadwell implementation as the comparison base for Skylake.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I22eb55ea89eb0d6883f98e4c72a6d243e819e6d8
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10340
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|