Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch currently contains the following -
1. Use SOC_INTEL_COMMON_BLOCK_FAST_SPI kconfig for common FAST_SPI code.
2. Perform FAST_SPI programming by calling APIs from common FAST_SPI library.
3. Use common FAST_SPI header file.
Change-Id: I4fc90504d322db70ed4ea644b1593cc0605b5fe8
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19055
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This patch use common PCR library to perform CRRd and CRWr operation
using Port Ids, define inside soc/pcr_ids.h
Change-Id: Id9336883514298e7f93fbc95aef8228202aa6fb9
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18674
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
1. Define controller for fast SPI.
2. Separate out functions that are specific to SPI and flash
controller in different files.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:59832
BRANCh=None
TEST=Compiles successfully for chell and eve.
Change-Id: I2fe0ef937297297339d4ea19dc37d3061caaa80c
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17933
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add the necessary infrastructure to support eSPI SMI events,
and a mainboard handler to pass control to the EC.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:58666
TEST=tested on eve board with eSPI enabled, verified that lid
close event from the EC during firmware will result in an SMI
and shut down the system.
Change-Id: I6367e233e070a8fca053a7bdd2534c0578d15d12
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17134
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Transition to using the common Intel ACPI hardware definitions
generic ACPI definitions.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:54977
Change-Id: I5f2aa424a167092b570fda020cddce5ef906860a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15671
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
|
|
- occured -> occurred
- accomodate -> accommodate
- existant -> existent
- asssertion -> assertion
- manangement -> management
- cotroller -> controller
Change-Id: Ibd6663752466d691fabbdc216ea05f2b58ac12d1
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12850
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The current construction for processing SMI GPI events
didn't allow for the mainboard to query the state of a
particular GPI for the snapshotted SMI event. The
skylake part can route GPIs from any (there are design
limitations) GPIO group. Those status and enable registers
are within the GPIO community so one needs to gather
all the possibilities in order to query the state.
The call chain did this:
southbridge_smi_gpi(
clear_alt_smi_status() -> reset_alt_smi_status() ->
print_all_smi_status() -> return 0)
As a replacement the following functions and types are
introduced:
struct gpi_status - represent gpi status.
gpi_status_get() - per gpi query on struct gpi_status
gpi_clear_get_smi_status() - clear and retrieve SMI GPI status
mainboard_smi_gpi_handler() - mainboard handler using gpi_status
Also remove gpio_enable_all_smi() as that construct was never
used, but it also is quite heavy handed in that it would
enable SMI generation for all GPIs.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43778
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built.
Original-Change-Id: Ief977e60de65d9964b8ee58f2433cae5c93872ca
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291933
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ida009393c6af88ffe910195dc79a4c0d2a4c029e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11208
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Provide #defines for the bit fields in the SMI status register.
This allows for one to set the callback accordingly without
hard coding the index.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43522
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted glados.
Original-Change-Id: I3e61d431717c725748409ef5b543ad2eb82955c4
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/289802
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I1a91f2c8b903de4297aaa66f5c6ff15f1b9c54f6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11184
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Add the files to support the Skylake SOC.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on a Skylake platform
Change-Id: I80248f7e47eaf13b52e3c7ff951eb1976edbaa15
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the Broadwell implementation as the comparison base for Skylake.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I22eb55ea89eb0d6883f98e4c72a6d243e819e6d8
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10340
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|